Can Ax = λx + b Be Solved in Euclidean Spaces?

ahmethungari
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is there any solution for the following problem:

Ax = \lambda x + b

Here x seems to be an eigenvector of A but with an extra translation vector b.
I cannot say whether b is parallel to x (b = cx).

Thank you in advance for your help...

Birkan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmethungari said:
Hi,

Is there any solution for the following problem:

$Ax = \lambda x + b$

Here $x$ seems to be an eigenvector of $A$ but with an extra translation vector $b$.
I cannot say whether $b$ is parallel to $x$ ($b = cx$).

Thank you in advance for your help...

Birkan

You didn't say what vector space you are working with, so I will assume a complex finite-dimensional vector space.

We can rewrite your problem as

(A - \lambda I)x = b

If b = 0, this has a solution if and only if lambda is an eigenvalue of A. Every map in a complex finite-dimensional vector space has an eigenvalue, so a solution exists in this case.

If b \neq 0, then this is equivalent to

b \in image(A - \lambda I)

For this to happen, it suffices that A - \lambda I be surjective. This is true if and only if A - \lambda I is invertible, which is true if and only if lambda is NOT an eigenvalue of A. Thus there are plenty of solutions in this case!
 
jbunniii said:
You didn't say what vector space you are working with, so I will assume a complex finite-dimensional vector space.

We can rewrite your problem as

(A - \lambda I)x = b

If b = 0, this has a solution if and only if lambda is an eigenvalue of A. Every map in a complex finite-dimensional vector space has an eigenvalue, so a solution exists in this case.

If b \neq 0, then this is equivalent to

b \in image(A - \lambda I)

For this to happen, it suffices that A - \lambda I be surjective. This is true if and only if A - \lambda I is invertible, which is true if and only if lambda is NOT an eigenvalue of A. Thus there are plenty of solutions in this case!


I got it. By the way, vector space is actually finite-dimensional (d=9000) Euclidean Space.

Since I do not know the \lambda, (only A and b are known) how can I find an numeric solution for that? Is there any way using eigenvalue logic here?
Such as
-- find eigenvalues of A,
-- check if b is parallel to any
-- select the appropriate eigenvector etc.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top