Can beat frequencies occur when the amplitude of the waves are different?

AI Thread Summary
Beat frequencies occur when two waves of the same amplitude but different frequencies are combined, resulting in amplitude modulation at the frequency difference of the two waves. When more than two waves interfere, the concept of beat frequencies becomes more complex, and calculating the resultant frequencies is not straightforward. The necessity for equal amplitudes in beat frequency generation is highlighted, as differing amplitudes disrupt the mathematical relationship that defines beats. The discussion emphasizes that beat frequencies are a mathematical phenomenon rather than a mystical occurrence. Overall, understanding beat frequencies requires a grasp of the underlying math involved in wave interference.
Dekans6
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When two waves of same amplitude but differing frequencies are added together, the frequency of the amplitude modulation of the resulting wave is the difference b/w the frequencies of the two parent waves.

How about beat frequencies from the interference of more than 2 waves, say 3, 4, or 10? How do we calculate that?

Also, it hasn't been clear to me why the two waves need to have the sample amplitude for beat frequency to occur...Isn't beat frequency only a function of the differences in frequencies and not a function of amplitude?

Could someone help me clarify these two questions?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could someone please help me with this?
 
Dekans6 said:
When two waves of same amplitude but differing frequencies are added together, the frequency of the amplitude modulation of the resulting wave is the difference b/w the frequencies of the two parent waves.

How about beat frequencies from the interference of more than 2 waves, say 3, 4, or 10? How do we calculate that?

2 sine waves add together to create 1 sine wave modulated by "beats".
3 sine waves add together to create 3 sine waves added together.

There may be some equivalent of "beats" in this case, but it wouldn't be exactly the same concept, and it would get a little fuzzy.

Also, it hasn't been clear to me why the two waves need to have the sample amplitude for beat frequency to occur...Isn't beat frequency only a function of the differences in frequencies and not a function of amplitude?

Beats aren't magic, it's just math. cos u + cos v = 2 cos(½(u+v)) cos(½(u−v))

Notice that formula doesn't work if you multiply one of the cosines by something. That's all there is to it. The sum of 2 sine waves with different amplitudes is just 2 sine waves with different amplitudes added together.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top