Can Biological Systems Mimic Semiconductor Functions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for biological systems to mimic the functions of semiconductors or nanoelectronic devices. Participants explore the feasibility of integrating biological systems with nanoelectronics, particularly at the cellular level, and consider the implications of such integration for both fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether biological systems can truly imitate semiconductors or if this idea is merely a fantasy, expressing interest in the potential for nanoelectronics to address biological problems.
  • Another participant suggests that reproducing the transistor is a necessary first step for creating biological semiconductors and provides links to relevant research on bacteria-produced nanowires acting like biological transistors.
  • A participant mentions the existence of organic light-emitting diodes as a related concept.
  • One contribution discusses how biological systems can imitate passive analog audio circuits, using examples from insect hearing mechanisms.
  • A participant expresses interest in the multidisciplinary nature of the research and seeks advice on useful courses for entering this field, sharing a relevant paper they found.
  • Another participant challenges the initial question by asking for clarification on the advantages of biological semiconductors over inorganic ones and what specific functions they could perform that silicon semiconductors cannot.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some exploring the potential of biological systems while others raise skepticism about their capabilities compared to traditional semiconductors. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the feasibility or advantages of biological semiconductors.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined what constitutes a "biological semiconductor," and there are differing assumptions about the capabilities of biological systems versus inorganic materials. The discussion includes references to specific research but does not resolve the technical challenges involved.

GNRtau
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Right, so I'm a freshman in college right now, so if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

Would it be possible to get a biological system to imitate or act like a semiconductor or nanoelectronic device or is that a fantasy? Does anyone here have experience doing it? Or perhaps use nanoelectronics to solve biological problems by integrating them with the human body on a cellular level?

Who knows, I might end up doing my Phd thesis on this!(just a joke...)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Biological systems can imitate passive analog audio circuits (or vice versa). In the case of insect binaural directional hearing, both the cricket and certain flies have internal structures to convert a binaural amplitude disparity to a constant amplitude phase difference.
 
Wow, haven't looked at this for a while, forgot about it. Sorry for reproducing an old discussion, but I'll check these out. I've also found a couple of a papers on the subject, trying to learn more.

I'm guessing this is a multidisciplinary line of research, but what sort of courses would be useful in order to get into a field doing this?

For anyone interested, here is a good one I found. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v468/n7323/full/468516a.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
GNRtau,

Would it be possible to get a biological system to imitate or act like a semiconductor or nanoelectronic device or is that a fantasy?

Those are two disparate subjects. To consider your first question, do you know what a semiconductor is? Why do you think a biological semiconductor would be better than a inorganic one? If it cannot do what a silicon semiconductor can do, why consider it?

In what way are you thinking of a "biological semiconductor" acting or imitating a inorganic one. Silicon semiconductors do a lot of things. What do you think biologicals can do that silicon can't?

For anyone interested, here is a good one I found. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v468/n7323/full/468516a.html

Is $18.00 that they want for a copy interesting enough?

Ratch
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K