Can Charge and EM Energy Change Metal Structure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "break-in" for audio cables, where users report improved sound quality after extended use. However, many participants argue that these claims lack scientific validation, with no peer-reviewed studies confirming changes in cable structure or sound quality due to break-in. The consensus suggests that any perceived improvement is likely psychological rather than physical, as the materials do not undergo detectable changes during normal use. The flow of energy through metals can cause heating, but this does not affect the cable's sound performance as claimed. Overall, the topic highlights skepticism towards audiophile claims about cable performance and emphasizes the need for empirical evidence.
bachrocks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

This is my first post.

Background: I am an audio guy and seek to understand how cables contribute to the sound of my stereo.

Issue: Do audio cables such as power cords, interconnects, and speaker cables "break in" as they are used? Typically, with high-end cables, users experience a break-in period where the sound is not optimal. Then, after a certain amount of hours--let's say 100-200, for example--the sound improves. In any case, this is a debatable topic, but for the purpose of this post, let's assume that they do break-in.

Question: I would like to ask if the flow of charge and energy through wire such as cooper or silver can change the structure of the metal in any way?

Closing: I do have a chemistry background, but I am quite weak with EE matters. Actually, my EE friend attributes the break-in to the insulator, not the wire. I believe him, but as I naively thought the metal might somehow change, I would like to ask the above question.

thank you,
ron
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi Ron
welcome to PF

seriously, it sounds like you have been getting too swayed by the audiophile fringe element :wink:

there's a whole bunch of characters out there with some incredibly wild and unfounded claims to cables and connectors etc.

as far as I'm aware pretty much none of the claims have withstood the scrutiny of lab tests under controlled conditions.
Their claims are all very personally subjective

Dave
 
Welcome to PF;
Do audio cables such as power cords, interconnects, and speaker cables "break in" as they are used? Typically, with high-end cables, users experience a break-in period where the sound is not optimal.

Electrical components do change with time, but mostly to make them worse rather than better. It's just entropy at work.

The reported break-in effect is psychological.
http://www.audioholics.com/audio-video-cables/audio-cable-break-in-science-or-psychological
... seems to have a fair discussion. Includes the "insulator" argument.
Not sure about the conspiracy theory argument - but certainly some salesfolks like to repeat the myth.

Anyone wants to confirm the "myth" will need to provide peer-reviewed references in support.
At least a reference to randomized double-blind tests, from a reliable source.
AFAIK: no such tests have confirmed the myth.

You can do the test yourself - find someone who reports a break-in period and see if they can tell between new and used cables. First make sure they can tell when they know it's the new one.

The flow of energy through a metal can change it, depending on the amount of flow. i.e. it can warm up. Some material properties depend on temperature etc. But that's not what you are talking about. The short answer is "no" - over the reported break-in period, there are no detectable changes in the metal of the wire during normal use, and the insulating dielectric does not become attuned, oriented, or polarized, to the wire.

The biggest influence on the sound quality from new wires is the psychology of the listener.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
 
Thank you so much Dave and Simon for your really fast reply. I deeply appreciate you help. :thumbs:

Cheers from Bangkok, Thailand,
ron
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top