Can Cold Cathode Tubes Enhance a Music Reactive Light System?

AI Thread Summary
Cold cathode tubes can enhance a music reactive light system, but their integration with existing circuits may present challenges. The current setup using a TIP31B transistor and a 12V source resulted in low light output, despite the tubes responding to music. Multiple transistors and speaker leads failed to produce the desired effect, raising questions about inverter usage and circuit design. Proper resistor values and connections are crucial for effective operation, as transistors can limit brightness rather than enhance it. Ensuring correct polarity and understanding the internal high voltage supply of cold cathode devices are essential for optimal performance.
DoomDuck
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am currently working on a music reactive light system with LEDs, but due to the low amount of light produced by the LEDs I was hoping to incorporate cathode tubes commonly found in desktop computers. I tried amplifying the signal from my mp3 player where the base current was produced by the player and the cathode's inverter was connected to a TIP31B transistor with a 12 V source. This produced a very low amount of light but the light did beat to the music, to a degree. I tried to use multiple transistors but that failed and surprisingly induced no light. Then opened some old computer speakers and tried to use the leads to the speaker as the base current but this produced no effect at all despite the higher current. Strangely when the ground of the inverter came into contact with the positive lead of the speaker and then the leads were placed in the circuit, the cathode would briefly light up and beat with the music but then slowly diminish until this ceased.

I am a bit baffled at both why multiple transistors and the speakers didn't work. This is my first experience with inverters, are there any special considerations with them?

Thanks,
Duck

These are the cathodes:
http://www.xoxide.com/bluecathode.html
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If it helps, the circuit set up is similar to this except in place of LEDs there is an inverter attached to the cathode tube. As stated earlier, that works but poorly. The 12 V is supplied by a modified computer power supply that acts as a bench top power unit, so the dc voltage being used should be very clean with regard to its signal.

This image is originally from:
http://www.instructables.com/id/Music-LED-Light-Box/step6/Building-the-circuit/
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 2,088
If you put a lamp or a LED (in series with a protective resistor) across a 12 volt supply, that is as bright as it is going to get. Adding a transistor in series with it will only make it dimmer.

The transistor acts like a variable resistance in series with the lamp or LED and gives you control over the device, but it can't make it brighter.

A PNP transistor like the TIP31 should not have its base grounded because this would cause its base current to be very large and it may destroy the transistor. The output of an amplifier is usually through a capacitor, so this probably saved your transistor.
You would need to have a suitable resistor in circuit from base to ground and then feed the input via a capacitor onto the base.
A suitable resistor might be 100 K, but you would have to check this by trying it. Make it smaller to send more current through the LED. You can also reduce the size of the 470 ohm resistor, but this is at some risk of letting too much current pass through the LED. Most LEDs will only cope with about 20 mA.
[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4222062/NPN%20%20LED%20AMP.PNG

Your cold cathode devices have an internal high voltage supply, so this is probably set up to be self protecting. Again, connect the device across 12 volts (observing polarity carefully) and that is as bright as it is going to get. If it is bright enough to be useful, then you can try to control it with transistors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top