Can Different Particle-Antiparticle Combinations Annihilate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMarioKingdom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation
SMarioKingdom
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I've been searching about particle-antiparticle annihilation and I've been wondering whether it was possible for particle to annihilate with antiparticle that is not its pair? Can annihilation occur with collision of different particle-antiparticle quarks(e.g. up antiquark and strange quark), with different particle-antiparticle leptons(e.g. electron antineutrino and muon) or with particle-antiparticle quark and lepton(e.g. bottom quark and antitau)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Usually not, as this would violate some conserved quantum numbers (charge, lepton numbers and so on). In addition, the "classic" annihilation via the electromagnetic force requires particle + corresponding antiparticle.

However, the weak interaction can allow some processes which could be considered as annihilation of different particles: Neutral kaons (strange + anti-down quark or anti-strange + down-quark) can decay to two photons, for example.
 


In some cases yes, It depends on wheter the annihilation violates conservation laws.
For example, in the quark sector flavor conservation is violated by intercation with the W boson.

Therefore, for example

u\bar{s}->W^{+}->e^{+}\nu_{e} is possible

In the lepton sector, in the limit of massless neutrinos, flavor is conserved and a muon can't annihilate with a electron neutrino( or anti electron neutrino).

quarks and leptons can't annihilate with each other due to baryon and lepton number conservation. ( which is simply an outcome of other conservation laws (charge, color etc..) doesn't have to be assumed)
 


mfb said:
Usually not, as this would violate some conserved quantum numbers (charge, lepton numbers and so on). In addition, the "classic" annihilation via the electromagnetic force requires particle + corresponding antiparticle.

However, the weak interaction can allow some processes which could be considered as annihilation of different particles: Neutral kaons (strange + anti-down quark or anti-strange + down-quark) can decay to two photons, for example.

So, do you mean, without weak interaction, such annihilation is impossible?
 


Some reactions "particle + different antiparticle -> 2 photons" are possible, but they have to include the weak interaction (together with the electromagnetic interaction).

One up-type quark (up, charm, top) plus a different up-type antiquark can annihilate to 2 photons.
One down-type quark (down, strange, bottom) plus a different down-type antiquark can annihilate to 2 photons.

Hmm.. I think if we neglect neutrino mixing, that was all.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top