Can Factorials Cause Divergence? Investigating the Divergence Test for Series

Je m'appelle
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the following series diverges

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n!}{2^{n}}

Homework Equations



The Divergence Test: In order for a series to be divergent, the following must be true

\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n \neq 0, or

\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n \nexists

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, I know how to work it out with the denominator, as it is a geometric series and therefore as n \rightarrow \infty,\ 2^{n} \rightarrow 1

But how do I do whenever I find a factorial? How do I work it out? I don't know what to do with this factorial, can I assume the following in this case

As n \rightarrow \infty,

n! \approx n

Then as n \rightarrow \infty it would summarize to

a_n = \frac{n}{2^{n}}, so by using L'hôpital's

\frac{\frac{d}{dn}n}{\frac{d}{dn} 2^{n}}

\frac{1}{2^{n}}, and then as n \rightarrow \infty,

\frac{1}{1} = 1 \neq 0Is this it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No.
n!=n(n-1)(n-2)... *3*(2)*(1) [ n terms]
2^{n}= 2*2*... *2 n times.

I have no idea what you are doing there.

Please write the expansion of n! and 2^{n} as the numerator and denominator then try to see why the limit does not exist.
 
Nevermind what I wrote before.

I was trying to show that the series was divergent by \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n \neq 0, but that's not possible because the limit doesn't exist, that's why I messed up. But by using \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n \nexists it can be shown that the series diverge. I had forgotten this second case and that's why I did some mess before on working out the first case heh.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top