Can Fibonacci Sequences Be Proven Using This Conjecture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramsey2879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Numbers
ramsey2879
Messages
841
Reaction score
3
Given A_1 = 3 \texttt{ and } A_n = A_{n-1}^{2} -2; is there a way to prove the following:

\prod_{i=1}^{n}A_{i} = F_{2^{n+1}}

or if someone has already proven this, can you give the reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note of is relation can be found at the first comment re the sequence 3,7,47 ... See http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A001566" , but I would like a proof if it is known.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
These two identities should get you there.

<br /> F_{2n}=L_{n}F_{n}<br />

<br /> L_{2n}=L_{n}^{2}-2(-1)^{n}<br />

Where L_n is the nth Lucas numbers.
 
MrJB said:
These two identities should get you there.

<br /> F_{2n}=L_{n}F_{n}<br />

<br /> L_{2n}=L_{n}^{2}-2(-1)^{n}<br />

Where L_n is the nth Lucas numbers.
Where can I find a proof of those identities?
 
Both identities can be proven using the closed form expressions for the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. The closed form expressions should be easily accessible. The one for the Fibonacci numbers is also known as Binet's formula.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top