Can Friction Force Balance Normal Force in a Vertical Direction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Video
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between friction force and normal force in a vertical context. It is clarified that the friction force acts parallel to the surfaces in contact and cannot oppose the normal force, which is defined as perpendicular to the surface. The question highlights that without friction between block A and the wall, the weight of block A cannot be balanced. The mention of friction between blocks A and B raises questions about its relevance to the problem. Ultimately, it is concluded that option (d) is correct, as friction cannot balance the normal force in this scenario.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

in this video question no 5 actually it is first question of the video but it's number is 5,i didn't understand this question.first i thought The force acting on block A is its weight in vertically downward direction, with no friction with the wall and Condition for equillibrium: Sigma Fx= 0, Sigma Fy= 0, & Sigma Fz= 0, Hence ,a vertical force can never be balanced by a horizontal force, whatever it (applied force) is, even infinity. Only friction force b/w wall and block A can balance weight of A. But here there is no friction b/w block A and the wall. Hence , option (d) is correct.but then i thought friction force is not necessarily be horizontal it just opposes motion in whichever direction ,so why it can't balance normal force and what about friction force between A &B ,it is especially mentioned in the question coefficient of friction between block b and a so won't it be used in the solution of problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like d is correct.

The friction force is always parallel to the surfaces in contact, so it cannot possible oppose the normal force on that contacting surface (which by definition of "normal" is perpendicular to the surface.)
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top