Can Gamma Radiation Penetrate a Geiger Counter from Any Direction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkfall13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Explain
darkfall13
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in a heated argument with a classmate about a portion of an experiment we did where we placed a beta emitter on a straight line from the Geiger counter placing a magnet within the path and other where the source was 90 degrees from the counter. Understandably depending on the orientation of the magnetic high or virtually zero readings would be made.

The contention comes from the use of a gamma source. He has measured 0 counts on the 90 degree orientation. While I measured considerably more than straight line travel (this was due to the 90 degree orientation actually puts the source closer to the counter). Understandably the magnet doesn't matter here anymore. But just before this portion of experimentation we dealt with the penetration of the radiation types, with gamma of course penetrating all the thicknesses of lead available.

But the argument comes from this orientation. He says that because the Geiger counter is orientation sensitive we should not observe a reading because the radiation vector does not point into the opening of the counter. While I argue that the Geiger counter is made of plastics and metals. Easily pierced by gamma radiation. So regardless of where the source is readings will occur. As I believe the counter works through Compton events within the chamber when gamma rays enter, therefore they can enter from anywhere the radiation can penetrate.

If at all possible I would like an explanation one way or the other as what the likely event is. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A Geiger counter will generally have a detection efficiency that depends on the direction of the incoming radiation, but it shouldn't be completely insensitive in any direction. Gamma and even some beta radiation will enter it and can trigger a response inside.

There is always some chance that the gamma rays knock out an electron before they reach your magnet, so the magnet can play a role.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top