Can Having Enough Bends in Circuit Conductors Cause Energy Loss?

AI Thread Summary
Charged particles emit radiation when they accelerate, which occurs when they navigate bends in a circuit. However, in practical terms, the energy loss from bends in a circuit is minimal, especially in DC circuits where the inherent random motion of electrons overshadows any impact from circuit geometry. For AC currents, electrons oscillate rather than move in a net direction, further reducing the significance of bends. Additionally, high-frequency signals can create radio emissions and magnetic fields, leading to design choices like twisting wire pairs to minimize inductive coupling. Overall, while bends can theoretically cause energy loss, their practical impact is negligible in typical circuit designs.
Prince Rilian
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
I am aware that when charged particles accelerate or decelerate, the particle will emit a certain amount of radiation. But since a charged particle will accelerate any time it goes around a bend in a circuit, wouldn't it radiate some energy when it goes around the bend?

I thought that giving two examples may aid in asking this question, where I can pose an "extreme case" thought experiment:

Circuit 1 with 2 km of Conductors.gif
Circuit 2 with 2 km of Conductors.gif


In both the above circuits, Vs is the same and the same amount of wire is used (two kilometers of it). But while the wire used Figure 1 has a minimum number of bends in it, that used in Figure 2 is a horribly tangled mess! Shouldn't the value of VR for Figure 1 be a little higher than that of VR for Figure 2 due to energy losses from all the bending routes the electrical current is forced to take in that circuit?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The electrons in a wire have an inherent, random motion which is orders of magnitude greater than the net drift velocity which is caused by the voltage applied.

So you can see that for a DC circuit the twists and turns will not add anything significant to the picture.

In the case of AC currents, there is no net motion for the electrons - they just move for and aft at 50 or 60 Hz, depending upon your local provider. So very few of them will see the turns at all.

There are other issues, depending upon the frequency and the current; these include radio emissions from high frequency signals, and magnetic fields. To limit the inductive coupling between wire pairs carrying high frequency data streams - they intentionally twist each pair together.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twisted_pair
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK. That explanation resolves the question.

Thank you!
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top