Can I convert a potentiometer to 2 resistors?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of converting a potentiometer into two resistors and understanding the implications of this conversion in a circuit. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of potentiometers, including their behavior in voltage divider configurations and their application in op-amp circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the potentiometer effectively splits its total resistance into two parts based on the position of the slider.
  • Others argue that the total resistance remains constant regardless of how the potentiometer is divided, similar to cutting a string into two pieces.
  • A later reply questions the appropriateness of using the potentiometer in the given circuit, suggesting potential reliability issues.
  • Participants discuss the calculation of voltage at specific points when the potentiometer is set to a certain percentage of its total value, with some confusion about the correct interpretation of these values.
  • There are challenges regarding the calculations and assumptions made about the voltage divider rule as applied to the potentiometer.
  • Some participants clarify that the resistance values derived from the potentiometer depend on the slider's position, which can create confusion in calculations.
  • There is a mention of the importance of not directly connecting the wiper of a potentiometer to an op-amp input due to design concerns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic principle that a potentiometer divides its resistance, but there is significant disagreement and confusion regarding the calculations and implications of this division in specific circuit contexts. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include unclear definitions of terms and assumptions about the circuit configuration that have not been explicitly stated, leading to confusion in calculations and interpretations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in circuit design, particularly those working with potentiometers and op-amps, as well as those looking to deepen their understanding of voltage dividers and resistance calculations.

  • #31
Femme_physics said:
Yes!

Just to check,


I'm asked if there's a linear connection between how you set "P" in precent, to Vout

Now, I presume that when Vout is -8 volts it's considered a higher voltage than -5 and even 0, since "voltage" by definition is all about potential difference?

So, in my opinion there is a linear connection since Vout increases the lower the potentiometer is!

Linear implies a straight line relationship, so it doesn't matter if the values are positive or negative :wink:

You should be in a position to write an expression for Vout as a function of a to see if the relationship is linear or not (form y = mx + b).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
Femme_physics said:
Ahh...there...

What I wrote is

"no , the relationship is not linear because according to the data P and Vout don't change at a constant rate"

I also proved it with math and graph

http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/5623/saifgimel.jpg

My apologies, but I suffered a brain fart when I agreed with your pronouncement that Vout is zero when a = 100% :blushing: If a is 100% and so Va = 4V, the input current is zero since there's no potential difference across R1. That means that there's also no potential drop across R2, making Vout the same as Va: Vout = 4V.

For your graph, I see you've put Vout = 0V when a = 0%, yet your table has it at -8V.

I think you'll find that the relationship of Vout vs a is in fact a linear one...

Write an expression for Va given a in percent. Write an expression for Vout given Va. Substitute the first expression into the second and collect on "a".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
My apologies, but I suffered a brain fart when I agreed with your pronouncement that Vout is zero when a = 100% If a is 100% and so Va = 4V, the input current is zero since there's no potential difference across R1. That means that there's also no potential drop across R2, making Vout the same as Va: Vout = 4V.

How come? If Vb = 4[v] and we have the Earth point defined...current will always flow from high to low! And Vout must go through R2 and R1, which therefor experience voltage drop...

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/8015/4voltsdifference.jpg

You're right that it's not 0... but if I use KVL I get


Sigma V = 0; Vout -4 -4 = 0

Vout = 8 [V]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
Femme_physics said:
How come? If Vb = 4[v] and we have the Earth point defined...current will always flow from high to low! And Vout must go through R2 and R1, which therefor experience voltage drop...

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/8015/4voltsdifference.jpg

You're right that it's not 0... but if I use KVL I get


Sigma V = 0; Vout -4 -4 = 0

Vout = 8 [V]
Where's Vin in your diagram? It's a 4V source. It'll be happy to supply the current through the potentiometer to ground.

If Va is at the same potential as Vin, no current can flow through the input resistor since there will be no potential difference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
You're right, come to think of it. So no current flows through R1 and R2. My original position was correct in that respect. I'm unfamiliar with the rule that says that if Va and Vb are 4 volts and no current flows through R2 and R1 then Vout must also equal 4 volts...although it does make sense...in this case there's no amplification, though, so the op-amp is kinda useless there
 
  • #37
Femme_physics said:
You're right, come to think of it. So no current flows through R1 and R2. My original position was correct in that respect. I'm unfamiliar with the rule that says that if Va and Vb are 4 volts and no current flows through R2 and R1 then Vout must also equal 4 volts...although it does make sense...in this case there's no amplification, though, so the op-amp is kinda useless there

It's just the circumstance for one particular setting of the potentiometer. The user can twist the knob to set a desired output, and 4V happens to be one choice. The op-amp is just doing its job to set Vout to a value that makes Va equal to Vb.
 
  • #38
Fair enough, but just to clarify:

For general cases of an op-amp, when Va = Vb and no current passes through R1 and R2, then Va = Vb = Vout
 
  • #39
Femme_physics said:
Fair enough, but just to clarify:

For general cases of an op-amp, when Va = Vb and no current passes through R1 and R2, then Va = Vb = Vout

It's certainly true for the given configuration where there's a single input resistance and feedback resistance. Essentially, when there's no current through a resistor the potential must be the same at either end of it. This is true whatever the circumstances. If that resistor happens to be the feedback resistor, then the potentials at the output and the op-amp inputs must be the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K