Can I Convert PSI to kPa Using Dimensional Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoeMaxwell92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting psi to kPa using dimensional analysis, specifically addressing the challenges of interpreting pounds as force versus mass. The conversion from psi to kPa is clarified, noting that 1 psi equals approximately 6.9 kPa, while 1 kPa is about 0.145 psi. It emphasizes that direct conversion from pounds to Newtons requires a clear definition of units and the gravitational acceleration constant. The conversation concludes that understanding unit definitions and conversion factors is crucial for accurate dimensional analysis. Overall, the thread highlights the importance of proper unit interpretation in pressure conversions.
JoeMaxwell92
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I was at lowes and I was trying to figure out the gauge pressure of a certain air compressor that used psi measurements. I don't have an iPhone or anything that can pull up internet converters so I figured I would have to do the conversion dimensionally. This posed a problem though as the pounds to kilograms converter on my phone doesn't recognize pounds as a force, but as a mass. I was wondering if there was some sort of calculus involved with dimensionally converting psi to kPa.
1 lb = .4536 kg_{in Earth's gravity}
with respect to time, pressure is the second derivative of kg/meter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JoeMaxwell92 said:
Ok, so I was at lowes and I was trying to figure out the gauge pressure of a certain air compressor that used psi measurements. I don't have an iPhone or anything that can pull up internet converters so I figured I would have to do the conversion dimensionally. This posed a problem though as the pounds to kilograms converter on my phone doesn't recognize pounds as a force, but as a mass. I was wondering if there was some sort of calculus involved with dimensionally converting psi to kPa.



1 lb = .4536 kg_{in Earth's gravity}
an object with a mass of 0.4536 kg has a weight of 1 pound on Planet Earth (that's about 4.45 Newtons).
with respect to time, pressure is the second derivative of kg/meter
No need for calculus...1 psi is 1 pound/square inch...convert pounds to kN (1 pound is 0.00445 kN) and convert square inches to square meters , and you end up with 1 psi is 6.9 kPa, or 1 kPa is 0.145 psi, approximately.
 
So I guess what you are saying is there is no way of converting pounds directly into Newtons by dimensional analysis without a definition, in Newtons, of what a pound is, or without multiplying the conversion from lbs to kg by the gravitational acceleration constant?
 
JoeMaxwell92 said:
So I guess what you are saying is there is no way of converting pounds directly into Newtons by dimensional analysis without a definition, in Newtons, of what a pound is, or without multiplying the conversion from lbs to kg by the gravitational acceleration constant?
That's right, you need a definition. It's all in the definition of the unit and the conversion factors between units. That is true even within the chosen system of measure itself. For example, a kN is the force required to accelerate 1000 kg of mass at a rate of 1 meter per second per second. But you first need to define the kilogram and meter and second per an international standard.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top