Can I find the distance from Ax to C in this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the distance from point Ax to point C in a beam problem. The user has already calculated Ay and By but is unsure if they have sufficient information to find the distance. Other participants confirm that enough information is available, noting that two sides and one angle of triangle ABC are sufficient for calculations. They suggest using trigonometric methods, specifically the cosine of angle A, to find the necessary distances. The user expresses gratitude for the guidance received in solving the problem.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm not sure if I have enough information. I solved for Ay and By. But do I have the distance from Ax to C when I isolate the beam AD?

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7963/20092009.jpg


P = 5 [kN]
Beams are weightless and connected by joints


The Attempt at a Solution



Attached
 

Attachments

  • at009.jpg
    at009.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 437
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Femme_physics said:
I'm not sure if I have enough information. I solved for Ay and By. But do I have the distance from Ax to C when I isolate the beam AD?

You do have enough information.
Of the triangle ABC you have 2 sides and 1 angle.
That is enough to completely determine ABC and anything related.

Can you calculate the angle between AB and AC?

Suppose you draw a line from C to a point on AB that is perpendicular.
Let's call this point E.
Can you calculate the length of CE now (using the angle)?
 
I like Serena is completely correct. More generally any time you drop a perpendicular from the right angle of a right triangle to the hypotenuse, you divide the triangle into two right triangles, both similar to the original triangle. If you are very clever, you don't need to calculate the angle at all or use any trig functions- however, you may find it simplest to use the cosine of A.
 
Good call, I need to find angle BAC first. I needed to think more instead of going to the league of genius (i.e. you) at the first sign of desperation. My gratitude :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top