Can I Learn Quantum Physics on My Own in Two Months?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an individual preparing for exams and expressing a strong interest in physics, particularly quantum physics. They seek advice on self-studying quantum physics and request book recommendations for beginners. The Griffiths textbook is highlighted as a gentle introduction suitable for undergraduates, emphasizing its accessibility for readers with basic knowledge of matrix algebra and multivariable calculus. Another recommended book is mentioned, which also serves as a good starting point. The conversation notes that familiarity with classical mechanics concepts, particularly Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations, can be beneficial for understanding more advanced topics in quantum physics.
bsrishu
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
i am just going to give my exams after two months. After that i will be free for 2-3 months, before i join any other institute.
I have done classical physics in detail in past two years.(not of engineering level, as i still hav to join a college)
i like physics very much.
Quantum world looks fascinating to me.
I want to know can i understand quantum physics own my own. If yes please suggest me some book with the ABC of quantum physics . Or should i do some other thing. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Griffiths book is a common starting point for many undergraduate students:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0131118927/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I haven't used the book before, but it seems to me that its purpose is a very gentle n soft introduction so that the reader can move to more detailed books.

One of my favorite books is:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199560277/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Bare in mind that you are generally expected to be familiar with the basic matrix algebra and multivariable calculus (differential & integral equations would be an advantage), but typically the books are self-contained.

More advanced topics make more use of concepts from classical mechanics (no, I don't mean Newton's mechanics, but rather Lagrange & Hamilton formulations).
Hint: formulation = version
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top