Can I see stars through the moon?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paddys09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the observation of what appears to be stars in a photograph of the moon, with participants exploring the possible explanations for this phenomenon, including optical effects, camera settings, and astrophysical concepts. The scope includes technical aspects of photography, optics, and some theoretical considerations related to gravity and light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the visible points in the photo are stars or an artifact of the camera, suggesting the possibility of seeing through the moon's shadow.
  • Another participant asserts that the moon is solid and challenges the idea of seeing through it, proposing that the observed points could be dust on the lens.
  • A different participant argues against the dust theory, suggesting that the light behind the points would make them appear dark if they were dust, and requests sensible explanations related to optics.
  • One participant mentions the need to calibrate for dust in astronomical images and proposes thermal noise as a likely explanation for the observed points.
  • Another participant expresses disappointment that the explanation is not something more exciting, like gravity bending light, but acknowledges that gravitational lensing requires a much more massive object than the moon.
  • A participant discusses the effects of exposure time, f-stop, and ISO settings on image noise, suggesting that all bright spots in the image are likely due to noise rather than actual stars.
  • One participant shares their own experience with a similar photographic setup and provides advice on exposure settings and techniques for capturing better images of the moon.
  • Another participant reflects on their inexperience with lunar photography and expresses a desire to learn more about the subject.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the observed points in the photograph, with some attributing them to camera noise and others considering the possibility of optical effects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding whether any actual stars are visible in the image.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could affect the quality of the photograph, including camera settings, exposure times, and the characteristics of the lens used. There is an acknowledgment of the limitations of the equipment and the experience level of the photographer.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrophotography, optics, and the technical aspects of capturing celestial images may find this discussion informative.

paddys09
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

A couple of weeks ago I took a photo of the moon, not sure if you will be able to see this in the image, but if you zoom in a bit after downloading it, you can see what I think are stars all over the background...

...The reason I say think is that I can see them through the shadow on the moon...Is this right? or is it something to do with the camera?

I thought it might have something to do with gravity etc but couldn't really come up with an explanation, so thought I would ask here...

Thanks

http://postimage.org/image/yhcaxmi1t/
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
moon.jpg
 
Are you serious? The moon is solid. WHATEVER is in your pic, you are not seeing through a solid body and I find it hard to believe you could even ask.

Probably dust on your lens.
 
Well no offense, but I find it hard to believe that you could think that those specs were dust, they would have to be so small the sensor wouldn't even pick them up. Plus the light would be behind them so they would appear dark if anything, i thought that would be basic physics...

Sensible answers only please, I realize it may be a stupid question, but I did highlight "think" in bold... Will accept other reasonable explanations... I figured some of you may know about optics...
 
Last edited:
In every astronomical image I've ever taken, you have to calibrate against dust (amongst other things). This is done when you take your flat images.

My bet is probably on thermal noise, though.
 
Yeah that makes sense, was just kind of hoping for it to be something cool, someone had mentioned to me that it might be gravity bending light...feel kind of stupid for believing them...

I originally thought it was just noise, definitely not dust though, if you look at the meta-data it was taken at f9 so any dust on the lens or sensor would be blurry if anything...

Yea, fairly confident it is noise now... Thanks for your response :) and your time...should have known better!
 
paddys09 said:
Yeah that makes sense, was just kind of hoping for it to be something cool, someone had mentioned to me that it might be gravity bending light...feel kind of stupid for believing them...

Sorry about being snippy before. Actually, the general concept of it being due to gravity is something that DOES happen and it's pretty cool, but the thing providing the gravity has to be WAY heavier than the moon. Google "gravitational lensing" to see what I mean.
 
Yea no worries, would'nt be a forum without it :) I reacted pretty badly too...

Thanks for the info, pretty interesting stuff, I knew I had heard something along those lines..Thats why I sort of went along with it...

Thanks too, Russ...Its great to have an answer, I am usually photographing things a bit closer to home so never really experienced noise that looks like that..

Cheers everyone :)
 
  • #10
You only need to see the noise across the lit area of the moon to realize how noisygrainy your image is. Its really no different an effect to the grainyness you would get on a film photo when you have under exposed. Lack of exposure time, incorrect f stop and ISO setting are your main culprits :)
I would go as far as to say ALL the brightspots right across the image are probably ALL due to the noise and there are probably no stars visible there at all, anywhere in the pic

You didnt say what focal length you were using ? I couldn't read the metadata
but if it was a small f/l less than a few 100 mm then you image is zoomed somewhat and that will also increase the visibility of noise

compare your pic to this one I did earlier in the year...

attachment.php?attachmentid=52649&stc=1&d=1352085753.jpg


thats 1000 mm f/l, f6.3 and 1 sec exposure at ISO 800

cheers
Dave
 

Attachments

  • moon1.jpg
    moon1.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 7,738
  • #11
Yes its taken with a 300mm lens @ f9, ISO800, 1/400sec that has been sharpened and cropped... I am sure that's why its noisy... I really wasn't trying to win any awards though...

Again, forgive my ignorance, my first time photographing the moon...the effect does kind of look like stars if you know virtually nothing about it... like I said I'm used to photographing things that are right in front of me with strobes, flashes etc, so this effect the noise has produced isn't something I have really experienced before...

All my decent glass is under 100mm, that was a very cheap 300mm lens as you can probably tell by the fringing around the moon...

Thanks for your time though...Great photo too, I might invest in a telescope if I'm going to attempt this again, I clearly need the education lol
 
Last edited:
  • #12
The exposure times used for the moon are normally too short to capture stars. The moon would be completely washed out in an exposure long enough to photograph stars.

Example image - Moon occulting the Pleiades:
528215316_97647faa97.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #13
paddys09 said:
Yes its taken with a 300mm lens @ f9, ISO800, 1/400sec that has been sharpened and cropped... I am sure that's why its noisy... I really wasn't trying to win any awards though...

Again, forgive my ignorance, my first time photographing the moon...the effect does kind of look like stars if you know virtually nothing about it... like I said I'm used to photographing things that are right in front of me with strobes, flashes etc, so this effect the noise has produced isn't something I have really experienced before...

All my decent glass is under 100mm, that was a very cheap 300mm lens as you can probably tell by the fringing around the moon...

Thanks for your time though...Great photo too, I might invest in a telescope if I'm going to attempt this again, I clearly need the education lol

Thats all cool... its always a learning experience :)

try some more pics and drop your exp times down to ~ 1 second. with your 300mm, you could try a 2 x teleconverter, that will give you 600mm and a much larger image on the frame.

Dont bother trying to photo a full moon, it will just be too glarey ( unless its a total eclipse)and washed out. Instead go for first 1/4 through to gibbous phase. Then you can get great crater detail along the terminator line like in my pic

a good steady mount doesn't go amiss either ;)

Dave
 
  • #14
Thanks Dave :smile:

Will pick up a tele-converter and give that a go...Cheers for all the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K