Can I Take the X Component Out When Differentiating with Respect to Z?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion of differentiating a force component with respect to a different variable. When calculating the cross product of the gradient and the x component of a force, the user questions whether they can treat the x component as a constant during differentiation with respect to z. Despite differentiating with respect to z, the x component remains relevant in the context of the equation. The user is trying to understand why the result does not equate to zero, indicating a misunderstanding of the differentiation process. Clarification is sought on the treatment of variables in this specific mathematical setup.
Oblio
Messages
398
Reaction score
0
I'm confused on a procedural idea...

If I'm doing the cross product of a gradient and 'the x component of a force' , so:

\nabla X F(x) = \frac{\partial}{\partial z} Fy

and Fy = x..

even though I am differentiating with respect to z , I am solving for an x component, which means I can not take x out with the other constants... yes? (if there were some)

I guess I'm confused because I know this shouldn't = 0 afterwards, but I'm not differentiating wrt z, so I'm trying to figure out why.


Thanks a lot !

(F(z) is 0 in case your wondering why its only Fy.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is one looking at something like this?

det \[ \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \hat{x} &amp; \hat{y} &amp; \hat{z} \\\<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\\<br /> F_x &amp; F_y &amp; F_z \end{array} \right]\]
 
yes I am...
thats how I set up the equation, but I don't know if I may take x out or not.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top