Can kinetic energy and potential energy both increase?

AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a helicopter accelerating upward, both kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) are increasing simultaneously. The helicopter gains altitude, which raises its potential energy, while its velocity increases, boosting its kinetic energy. This situation is not energy-conservative due to the external work done by the lifting force of the helicopter. The work-energy theorem applies here, as the work done by the helicopter's force contributes to the change in kinetic energy. Thus, both types of energy can increase when external forces are involved.
thepegmeister
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A helicopter, starting from rest, accelerates straight up from the roof of a hospital. The lifting force does work in raising the helicopter. (a) What type(s) of energy is (are) changing? Is each type increasing or decreasing? Why?


Homework Equations



Power=Work/Time
Work=Change in KE

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I would think that potential and kinetic energy are both changing; both increase because the helicopter gains altitude (increasing PE) and increases velocity (increasing KE). Is this correct? I know that in a situation where energy is conserved, one must decrease as the other one increases. I'm not sure whether this qualifies as an energy-conservative situation, though.

b) The work-energy theorem. The work done by gravity + work done by helicopter = change in KE. Is this correct?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer to a) is correct. Energy is conserved when there are no external forces do work on the system. In this case, the system is the helicopter, and the external force is the air is pushing it up. (Gravity doesn't count as an external force because you're already taking it into account with the potential energy.) That's why both types of energy can increase.

You're also correct about the work-energy theorem.
 
Thank you, Vela! I really appreciate it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top