Can Laser Intensity Stabilization Be Improved for Precise Measurements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssmoke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity Laser
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of a collimated laser setup involving a Thorlabs CPS180 laser, polarizers, a beam splitter, and photo-diodes, where intensity measurements fluctuate by 0.2mV over the first hour. The user notes an initial increase in intensity for 30 minutes, followed by a decrease for 15 minutes before stabilizing, raising concerns about the laser's performance. Suggestions include checking the laser's supply voltage and monitoring the polarization ratio as the laser warms up. There are inquiries about whether the issue lies with the laser, photo-diode, or LabVIEW software. The importance of precise measurements within a few hundredths of a milliVolt is emphasized, indicating a need for improved stabilization techniques.
ssmoke
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working with a setup involving a collimated laser (Thorlabs model CPS180), two polarizers, a beam splitter, and 2 photo-diodes. While measuring the intensity of the laser via LabView, without changing any of the components, I find the intensity varies by 0.2mV for the first hour of measurement. it increases for about the first half hour, then decreases for the next 15 minutes before even starting to stabilize. This seems like very odd behavior, even if the laser needs some time to warm up.

For my experiment, it is important that the laser be stable to within a few hundreths of a milliVolt. Do you think the problem is with my laser, photo-diode, or even the LabVIEW program?

If the problem is with my laser, is there a simple way to stabilize the intensity?
 
Science news on Phys.org
You might want to check the supply voltage to the laser to make sure it isn't changing, hence changing your wavelength and power a bit. I'm also not sure how the polarization ratio in these lasers changes as they warm up. Are you monitoring it after you pass it through your optics?
 
I think most of my measurements have been taken with at least one polarizer.
 
You mentioned how much the laser intensity changed, but not the average value (i.e the relative change). How large was it?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top