Can Lorentz Transformations in Opposite Directions Cancel Each Other Out?

AI Thread Summary
Transforming coordinates using Lorentz transformations in opposite directions with the same speed results in returning to the original space-time coordinates. By applying the transformation equations twice—first for velocity v and then for -v—both x and t coordinates revert to their initial values. The key is to correctly substitute the transformed coordinates back into the equations. This process demonstrates that the transformations effectively cancel each other out. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the implications of relativity in physics.
john morrison
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Show that if we transform first in the x-direction and then in the minus x direction with the same speed (v), we end up with the original space-time coordinates. Note: For this problem you will need to apply the transformation equation twice. You will also need to apply the transformations to both x and t.

Homework Equations


[/B]
x' = \gamma(x-Vt)
y' = y
z' = z
t' = \gamma(t-(Vx)/c^2))

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I attempted to plug in -x into the x for x' and then plug in x' whenever I found an x. However, this didn't get me far.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is asking you to apply the Lorentz transformation once with velocity v and once to the resulting coordinates with velocity -v (you can call the coordinates resulting from this t'' and x''). Your task is then to show that x'' = x and t'' = t. The problem does not tell you to switch the directions of the x or t axes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top