Can matter focus neutrinos in a supernova event?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether neutrinos can focus in a supernova event due to density variations in the star's outer layers. It is suggested that while neutrinos are responsible for expelling the star's outer mass, their weak interaction with matter limits their ability to cause significant focusing or electrical polarization. The participants express skepticism about the potential for neutrinos to create electrical fields or electromagnetic radiation as they escape. Despite the small effects, the idea that neutrinos contribute to the asymmetry of supernova explosions is acknowledged. Overall, the complexities of neutrino interactions and their role in supernova dynamics remain a topic of inquiry.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
The initial flux of neutrinos from a supernova is mostly radial (say we are far from where they are produced but also far below the top of the dying star)? As the neutrinos help blow the top off the star do the density variations of the outer portions of the star act like a variable index of refraction and cause focusing of the radial neutrino flux? If so what might typical focusing power be 2X, 20X, ... times the average flux?

Does the neutrino flux cause an electrical polarization of the expelled outer layers of the star, if so what might the maximum electrical fields be? If this polarization relaxes can we expect electromagnetic radiation?

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I haven't made any quantitiative analysis. However neutrinos react very weakly with matter so I doubt if there is any such effect as you described.
 
Neutrinos have no charge and hardly interact with the outer layers of the star during a core collapse event.
 
Chronos said:
Neutrinos have no charge and hardly interact with the outer layers of the star during a core collapse event.

I realize the effect may be very small but reading the following I was under the impression that it was the neutrinos that were responcible for blowing off the top of the star? I'm guessing there should be a back of the envelope calculation for an estimate for this effect. I have the envolope and pen but not sure how to proceed.

http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...eCollapse.html

"When a stellar core collapses, its high density spurs the creation of thermal neutrinos through a variety of processes. The core itself is not transparent to neutrinos, so they interact and come into thermal equilibrium with the core before escaping. The mass surrounding the core is almost transparent to these neutrinos, so very few neutrinos give up energy to the surrounding mass. The tiny amount of energy lost by the neutrinos to the surrounding mass, however, is more than sufficient to blow this mass away from the core. The most energetic explosions in the universe therefore hide most of their energy from our sight; we see the brilliant light and the high speed of the supernova debris, but we almost never see the neutrinos that carry away almost all of the energy generated in the birth of the neutron star. ...

In particular from the above,

"The mass surrounding the core is almost transparent to these neutrinos, so very few neutrinos give up energy to the surrounding mass. The tiny amount of energy lost by the neutrinos to the surrounding mass, however, is more than sufficient to blow this mass away from the core."

If true the outer layers are given a tremendous kick and it seemed that the kick would not be symmetric between the light electron and the heavier positively charged nuclei?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The neutrinos we receive are the ones that did not give up their energy to the outer envelope, so, I can think of no reason they would be refracted. We know, however, almost nothing about their distribution. We only detect a handful of neutrinos from any given supernova explosion [they don't give up energy to our detectors any easier than they do to the outer envelope]. Supernova explosions are, however, assymetric. See 'Neutron Star Kicks and Supernova Asymmetry', for discussion.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top