Can Maximum Bending Strain Be Calculated Without Knowing Young's Modulus?

AI Thread Summary
Determining maximum bending strain in a beam typically requires knowledge of Young's modulus, as it directly influences strain calculations. While bending stress can be calculated using equations that do not depend on material properties, such as Euler's model, the resulting strain and deflection are contingent on Young's modulus. The discussion highlights that while stresses can be evaluated from known dimensions and forces, the question specifically asks for maximum bending strain, which necessitates incorporating Young's modulus. Therefore, the answer may be expressed in terms of known stresses and Young's modulus. Ultimately, calculating maximum bending strain without Young's modulus is not feasible.
maniaciswicke
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Very simply put.
Is it possible to determine bending stress in a beam without knowing the young's modulus of the material used? All equations I've seen seem to include in some form an E value ( young's modulus), which is used in conjunction with a stress value to evaluate the strain.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The forces and therefore the stresses in many beams are statically determinate so they do not depend on the material. Euler's model of beam bending gives.

\frac \sigma y = \frac M I

Where \sigma is the stress, y is the offset from the neutral axis, M is the bending moment and I is the 2nd moment of area.

The Euler-Timoshenko model also includes shear stresses.

The strains, and therefore the amount of deflection of the beam, DO depend on Young's modulus.
 
This is what i thought.
It is a homework problem but i wasn't asking for the answer, merely if it was possible to solve. The dimensions of the beam are known so i agree the stresses are quite straightforward. The question very clearly asks for the "maximum bending strain" though. Could i perhaps give the answer in terms of the known stresses and E?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top