Can Modifying the Flexiforce Drive Circuit Enhance Sensor Performance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter prescott2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Drive
AI Thread Summary
Modifying the Flexiforce drive circuit to a Wheatstone bridge or instrumentation amplifier could potentially enhance performance metrics like linearity, hysteresis, and repeatability. The original circuit is based on the manufacturer's data sheet, but some users have noted peculiarities in its design. Questions arise regarding the input/output characteristics of the operational amplifier used in the circuit. Understanding these characteristics is crucial for assessing potential improvements. Overall, exploring alternative circuit designs may yield better sensor performance.
prescott2006
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Attached is the Flexiforce drive circuit. I would like to ask whether I can improve improve the performance of Flexiforce in term of linearity, hysteresis, repeatability, or whatsoever other parameter by change the drive circuit to Wheatstone bridge or instrumentation amplifier?
 

Attachments

  • flexi-circuit-new.jpg
    flexi-circuit-new.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 469
Engineering news on Phys.org
prescott2006 said:
Attached is the Flexiforce drive circuit. I would like to ask whether I can improve improve the performance of Flexiforce in term of linearity, hysteresis, repeatability, or whatsoever other parameter by change the drive circuit to Wheatstone bridge or instrumentation amplifier?

Where did you get that circuit from? A couple things look weird about it, obviously. What are the I/O characteristics of that opamp?
 
berkeman said:
Where did you get that circuit from? A couple things look weird about it, obviously. What are the I/O characteristics of that opamp?

I get it from Flexiforce data-sheet, that is their recommended excitation circuit. What are the things that look weird? What do you mean by I/O characteristic of the opamp?
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top