Can n be negative? What values of n allow for negative numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gikiian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the factorial function, which is typically defined for natural numbers and cannot yield negative values. However, the Gamma function serves as a natural extension of the factorial, allowing for negative inputs. This extension can produce negative outputs, as illustrated by specific negative values of n. The conversation highlights the mathematical implications of extending the factorial to include negative numbers through the Gamma function. Overall, the Gamma function provides a framework for understanding factorials beyond their conventional limits.
gikiian
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
If yes, then for what values of n?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We usually only define ##n!## for natural numbers ##n##. Then ##n!## can never be negative.

There is however a very natural extension of the factorial, this is called the Pi function (which is just a translation of the Gamma function). This can indeed become negative as you can see from the graph: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If we extend the domain we can have negative numbers for example
-1~(-3.74768264672741260139148848269149969586163939513235551205229915)!
-1~(-3.45702473822080062303945414765117954323659790903378442096479450)!
 
THAT is what I wanted to see. Thank you very much Sir.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top