Can Natural Electrical Circuits Be Found in Nature?

AI Thread Summary
Natural electrical circuits can be found in various forms in nature, including phenomena like lightning, static electricity, and the electrical activity in living organisms such as electric fish. Examples of complete circuits occur when dissimilar metals are in contact with electrolytes, as seen in seawater or soil, and during solar storms that induce currents in conductive materials. Lightning serves as a natural example of a closed circuit, where charge builds up in clouds and discharges to the Earth, maintaining overall electrical neutrality. The discussion highlights that all electrical circuits, whether natural or artificial, adhere to the same fundamental laws of physics, including potential, current, and resistance. The complexity and behavior of these circuits can vary significantly, but they fundamentally operate under the same principles.
edenenix15
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I have a strange question. Can complete electrical circuits be found in nature? If so, can you give any examples? And what is necessarily required (besides electricity) for a complete electrical circuit to occur, naturally or unnaturally?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How about the nervous system in your own body?
 
Right sorry, I also mean found in non living matter. Like rocks, or water, or wood.
 
How about galvanic corrosion?

I'm sure there are dozens and dozens of examples.
 
What about lightning ?
Charge is carried aloft , returns to Earth
Kirchoff seems to be okay with the time delay.
Or you could think of it as a capacitance phenomenon...
 
My random thoughts:
There is electrical energy flowing whenever there are electrically connected dissimilar metals in an electrolyte. Happens in seawater a lot. Or, even in the ground (like oil and gas pipelines).
Static electrictity charge accumulation and discharge is common, the most dramatic being lightning. Static electricity accumulates and dissipates routinely on all sorts of surfaces.
The northern lights are electrical phenomena due to solar storms.
Solar storms create induced currents in all sorts of things (power lines, pipelines, anything that conducts).
Anytime a piece of metal moves in the Earth's magnetic field there are induced currents.
Electric fish are a dramatic living example.

Two major sources:
Any place a charge can accumulate and dissipate from natural causes, either chemical or physical, you have, by definition, a complete circuit.
Any conductor moving in a magnetic field or conductor in a changing magnetic field.
 
I know there are plenty of examples for natural electrical currents, but is something like lightning a complete electrical circuit? Such as those found in computers and nervous systems?
 
edenenix15 said:
there are plenty of examples for natural electrical currents, but is something like lightning a complete electrical circuit? Such as those found in computers and nervous systems?

The important thing you should know is thst charge is conserved. It does not just appear or disappear.

If lightning was not part of a complete circuit it would leave a big pile of plus charges someplace and another pile of minus charges another place. Since we don't find charged places like that on this planet, the circuit must be closed, no matter how indirectly. Does that make sense to you?

The actual ways those charges migrate to meet up eventually may be hard to identify. But the fact that ereryplace is approximately neutral is the evidence that it must happen.
 
Lightning IS the completion of the circuit. Charges build up in the clouds and then discharge as a lightning bolt or other plasma effects. Current flows, that's a circuit. There are probably simulation models that describe the lightning circuit in gross detail (I've never looked --- maybe you can).
 
  • Like
Likes donpacino
  • #10
meBigGuy said:
Charges build up in the clouds
Unipolar?

Considering only cloud-earth lightning:
If the initial and final conditions are neutral clouds and neutral earth, and if the lightning stroke transports charge, then it follows that there must be an additional flow of charge from-cloud-to Earth either pre or post strike to make everything balance. We don't need any models at all to know that the time integral of cloud-earth charge migration must be zero.
 
  • #11
then it follows that there must be an additional flow of charge from-cloud-to Earth either pre or post strike to make everything balance.
i've long felt it's got to have something to do with evaporation of the water that makes thunderclouds

upload_2016-1-10_7-29-58.png
^^ looks to me like a mechanism for charge transport

upload_2016-1-10_7-34-44.png

Fridman & Kennedy, Plasma Physics and Engineering

Might that orientation 'positive inward negative outward' be an invitation for evaporating water molecules to carry away an occasional hitch-hiking electron as they depart the surface ? Thus carrying negative charge to the bottom of the forming cloud ?i'm no expert - it's a question not an assertion
 
Last edited:
  • #12
anorlunda said:
Since we don't find charged places like that on this planet, the circuit must be closed, no matter how indirectly. Does that make sense to you?

Yup, that makes perfect sense. My next question is, for lightning as a closed circuit, do we see any difference in lightning's circuit compared to the circuits that lead up to intelligence? Natural or artificial? I'm guessing no?
 
  • #13
Every circuit is different. Do they all follow the Electrical Laws of Physics? -- Of course. Do they all involve potential, current, capacitance, inductance, resistance, and energy in some configuration? --- Of course. Are there, within the laws of Physics, huge differences between circuits? Of course.

At some geometries maybe the quantum effects are more significant to overall behavior, etc, but the all follow the same rules.

Some circuits may be dominated by capacitance, some by inductance, some thousands of volts, some thousands of amps. SOme may have 3 components, some thousands. Can we model them and simulate them with variations in the basic components values, I think so.

But, that's like saying all physical systems are the same, atoms, and galaxies. Not sure it is a meaningful statement.

Not sure how else to answer the question.
 
Back
Top