Can Non-Biological Catalysts Break Down Hydrogen Peroxide?

AI Thread Summary
Non-biological catalysts can indeed break down hydrogen peroxide, with transition metals being effective in this process. Silver is highlighted as a simple catalyst that has historical significance in rocket fuel development. Additionally, a combination of iron(III) chloride and sodium hydroxide is noted to catalyze the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. The discussion emphasizes the availability of various non-biological catalysts for this reaction. Overall, there is a range of options for catalyzing hydrogen peroxide decomposition outside of biological systems.
LadiesMan
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Catalysts and Hydrogen Peroxide

1. Can catalysts other than those found in living cells break down hydrogen peroxide?

Does anyone know of any sources I can get information on this question? I can't seem to find anything :(. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't most of the transition metals catalyze hydrogen peroxide's decomposition? Trying Googling specifically for the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide.
 
A simple silver catalyst decomposes hydrogen peroxide - this was the basis of the British space program in the 60s, a rocket fueled solely by H2O2.
 
a mixture of FeCl3 and NaOH acts as a catalyst for H2O2 decomposition.
 
thanks
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top