Can Nonlinear Systems Be Solved Using Gaussian Elimination?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Non-linear System
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



This problem shows up in Anton's Elementary Linear Algebra in the first chapter. It's one of the last problems, so I don't think that it is crucial for me to 'solve' it. But I would like to clear up some conceptual questions I have.

First here is the problem statement:

Solve the following system of nonlinear EQs for the unknown angles \alpha, \beta, and \gamma, where

0\le\alpha\le2\pi, 0\le\beta\le2\pi, 0\le\gamma\le\pi.

2\sin\alpha - \cos\beta + 3\tan\gamma = 3
4\sin\alpha + 2\cos\beta - 2\tan\gamma = 2
6\sin\alpha - 3\cos\beta + \tan\gamma = 9

Here are my questions:

1) In all of this chapter (on elimination methods), we use Gaussian Elimination on systems of linear EQs. Can the elimination methods be used on a nonlinear system?

2) Since tan(gamma) is not defined at pi/2 , well..., I don't know what I am trying to ask.
But surely this restriction will have some sort of impact on the solution(?).

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's linear in the trigonometric functions so you can just use linear techniques to solve for them. It's invertible too, if I'm not mistaken. So you will get three trig equations to solve. pi/2 is not a valid solution for gamma.
 
Call x = sin(\alpha),\ y = \cos(\beta),\ z = \tan(\gamma)

and proceed.
 
LCKurtz said:
Call x = sin(\alpha),\ y = \cos(\beta),\ z = \tan(\gamma)

and proceed.

Right. This is what i planned on doing, but I just wasn't sure why they were so adamant on letting me know that it is nonlinear.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top