Can Opposite Angles Determine Special Properties in Quadrilaterals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a user inquires about the implications of having two opposite angles of a quadrilateral measuring 90 degrees. Clarification is sought regarding the definition of "opposite" angles, leading to a mention that the sum of the other two angles equals 180 degrees. The conversation reveals that if the angles share a common side, the shape could be classified as a trapezium. Ultimately, the user resolves their initial problem independently and decides not to pursue further assistance. The discussion highlights the relationship between angle properties and quadrilateral classification.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, can someone please help me out? I need to know if I can draw any conclusions from the following.

There is a quadrilateral such that two 'opposite' internal angles are 90 degrees. Is there anything that I can say about the line segment joining the two vertices of the quadrilateral which correspond to the other two internal angles? The 'other' vertices being the ones whose corresponding internal angle is not 90 degrees.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benny said:
Hi, can someone please help me out? I need to know if I can draw any conclusions from the following.

There is a quadrilateral such that two 'opposite' internal angles are 90 degrees. Is there anything that I can say about the line segment joining the two vertices of the quadrilateral which correspond to the other two internal angles? The 'other' vertices being the ones whose corresponding internal angle is not 90 degrees.

What exactly do you mean by opposite? Can you sketch a diagram? I had a post typed out before but your meaning is ambiguous so I deleted it.
 
In any case, the sum of the other two angles is 180 degrees.

And, if by opposite, you mean that the two angles have one forming side in common, then the figure becomes a trapezium.
 
I meant opposite as in the vertices I referred to were not formed by sides which are adjacent. Nevermind though, I figured out a way to do the problem I was working on without working using bisection of internal angles. Thanks anyway.
 
Benny said:
There is a quadrilateral such that two 'opposite' internal angles are 90 degrees. Is there anything that I can say about the line segment joining the two vertices of the quadrilateral which correspond to the other two internal angles?
Yes, there is something very specific that can be said about this line segment.

Do you want to post your result here so we may be able to help further ?

Edit : Nevermind. It looks like this was part of another problem that you were working on.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top