I Perfect Spheres: A Theoretical Possibility or an Impossibility?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kolleamm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spheres
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical existence of perfect spheres, with one participant arguing that cutting a sphere reveals an arc that approaches flatness but never fully reaches it, implying that perfect spheres cannot exist. Another participant counters this by stating that arcs can be mathematically defined and emphasizes that the atomic structure of matter prevents any object from being perfectly round. The conversation highlights the limitations of physical objects due to their atomic composition. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the impossibility of achieving a perfect sphere in reality. The topic raises interesting questions about the nature of perfection in geometry and physical objects.
kolleamm
Messages
476
Reaction score
44
I've been wondering about this for a while. If you were to take a perfect sphere and cut it in half so that you would see a circle and then use a magnifying glass to zoom in closer and closer on part of the circle, the arc would approach near flatness but it would never reach it so therefore since an arc is constantly changing it cannot be fully defined therefore perfect spheres cannot exist in the real world. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Agree.

World's Roundest Object!:
 
kolleamm said:
If you were to take a perfect sphere and cut it in half so that you would see a circle and then use a magnifying glass to zoom in closer and closer on part of the circle, the arc would approach near flatness but it would never reach it so therefore since an arc is constantly changing it cannot be fully defined therefore perfect spheres cannot exist in the real world. What do you think?

That is incorrect. The arc of a circle is easily "defined" using several different equations. A perfect sphere cannot exist in real life mainly because matter is made up of atoms, which put a limit on how smooth and accurate the surface can be. It will never be perfectly round.
 
  • Like
Likes kolleamm, atom jana and billy_joule
Thanks everyone for the replies
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top