Can Photons from a Laser Distort Space-Time Like Massive Objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Teleros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Teleros
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know photons are massless, but is it possible at all for them in the form of say a laser to distort the curvature of space in the same way as an object with mass would? And if so is there any way to measure how much?

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Teleros said:
I know photons are massless, but is it possible at all for them in the form of say a laser to distort the curvature of space in the same way as an object with mass would?
Yes, because photons have energy. In General Relativity, the source of gravity (and space-time distortion) is not mass, but energy (really the stress-energy tensor).
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, because photons have energy. In General Relativity, the source of gravity (and space-time distortion) is not mass, but energy (really the stress-energy tensor).

Situation: i am traveling at 99,999...etc. speed of light and my mass is about 5000% my real mass. so, my gravitational distortion is 5000% more deeper than the stationary condition.

but, as you assume, it's energy that makes the grav field, but i have an incredible cinetic energy (K=1/2mv²/gamma), and the distortion that it produces should grow if i also consider the distortion of my mass (not rest mass...the other i don't know the name) so my grav field is more than i aspect or there is something strange in your quote?
 
:rolleyes: Probably should've put a disclaimer about my poor maths in the first post. That article went way over my head:-p ...

Ok now simple energy I can understand (E=MC^2 can do that), but whilst I can understand that working for a single photon, can it work for a laser? If not, what I need is something where you can input say the diameter and length of the laser (plus energy at the target) to work out its equivalent mass (if that makes any sense at all :-p ). Damn I wish I could do maths better :( .
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top