Can Relativity and Gravity Coexist?

granpa
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
7
when you factor relativity into the interactions of charged particles you get magnetism. Relativity says that magnetism is required to make the laws governing the interactions invariant.

What about gravity? When you factor relativity into gravitational interactions do you get yet another field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
granpa said:
What about gravity? When you factor relativity into gravitational interactions do you get yet another field?

If you start with Newton's theory of gravity and add relativity, you don't get a theory that predicts what we observe. There is a well known paper by Currie, Jordan & Sudarshan that shows that it's not possible to have a relativistic interaction term in Hamiltonian theory. So it would appear that a proper theory of gravity can't be constructed this way.

General relativity is built on SR so it is already there. GR and SR are kinematic systems. In GR, the sources of gravity don't interact directly with each other, but affect the spacetime, which is the background of the kinematics.

I've got a feeling I've not answered your question, but that's how I see it.
 
If you start with special relativity and add Newton's law of gravity, it will be very difficult if not impossible to avoid inconsistencies in the theory (because the force propagates with infinite speed).
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top