Can Set Theory Prove Equality and Intersection Properties?

brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi, I would like some help for the following problems.

please bear with me with my special notation:
I- intersection
U- union
S- universal set
~- complement

I need to prove that: let be A and B two sets. prove
(A U B) I (A I (~B))=A

what I did is:
(A U B) I (A I (~B))

=[(A I B) U A] I [(A I B) U ~B]/distribution

=A I [(~B U A) I (~B U B)]

=A I [(~B U A) U S)

=A I (~B U A)

=(A I (~B)) U (A I A)

=AUA=A //i'm not sure here (A I (~B)) =A

problem 2

Can we conclude that A=B if A,B,C are sets such that
i) A U C = B U C
ii) A I C = B I C

how can I treat this problem?

Thank you for your help
B
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I need to prove that: let be A and B two sets. prove
(A U B) I (A I (~B))=A
As stated, that's not true. (e.g. let A be any nonempty set, and let B equal A)

but that said...

(A U B) I (A I (~B))

=[(A I B) U A] I [(A I B) U ~B]/distribution
It doesn't look like you applied this rule right.

=A I [(~B U A) U S)

=A I (~B U A)
This step is wrong too.


how can I treat this problem?
I would try and draw a picture to help with my intuition.
 
Because it's the Calculus & Beyond forum.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top