Can Slow Space Travel Overcome the Speed Barrier in Vacuum Flight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of developing a vehicle for space travel that operates without traditional rocket propulsion, emphasizing the importance of achieving sufficient speed rather than merely covering distance. The conversation highlights that rockets are necessary to overcome Earth's gravity and atmospheric drag to reach orbital velocity. Manned spaceflight faces additional concerns regarding radiation exposure and the effects of microgravity over time. Solar sails are mentioned as a potential alternative, but their low acceleration means they take longer to gain speed, limiting their practicality. Overall, the feasibility of slow space travel as a solution to speed barriers remains a complex issue.
spacecadet11
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello. Thanks for previous responses. I asked a question about developing a vehicle that 'flies' in a vacumn instead of a rocket. Apparently the issue with space travel is the required speed. Not distance traveled per se above the Earth's surface or the fact that the vehicle has to travel thru a vacumn...per se.

I might have further questions in the future.
Bye
SC
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
spacecadet11 said:
Hello. Thanks for previous responses. I asked a question about developing a vehicle that 'flies' in a vacumn instead of a rocket. Apparently the issue with space travel is the required speed. Not distance traveled per se above the Earth's surface or the fact that the vehicle has to travel thru a vacumn...per se.

I might have further questions in the future.
Bye
SC

So you are talking about a solar sail?
 
spacecadet11 said:
Hello. Thanks for previous responses. I asked a question about developing a vehicle that 'flies' in a vacumn instead of a rocket. Apparently the issue with space travel is the required speed. Not distance traveled per se above the Earth's surface or the fact that the vehicle has to travel thru a vacumn...per se.
The bolded statement is a bit confusing. A vehicle in space usually requires propulsion (from a rocket) unless it has enough velocity to coast to it's destination.

For spacecraft from the Earth's surface to orbit, the rocket must provide sufficient thrust to overcome gravity (weight of the vehicle) and drag in the atmosphere while providing accelertion to orbital velocity - assuming that one wishes to achieve orbit. Then it is a matter of climbing the rest of the way out of Earth's 'gravity well', and then getting up to a velocity to travel to some other destination.

Time to destination is an issue for manned flights because of the deleterious effects of radiation exposure and 0-gravity. The time is a function of distance and velocity, and the achieve velocity is dependent on the acceleration, which is dependent on the thrust and mass of the craft (including expendable propellant). Thrust efficiency is expressed as specific impulse and ultimate that is dependent on the propulsive technology and specific energy, kJ/kg (or specific power, kW/kg) of the propuslive and power generation systems.

Solar sails or the like are attractive since no on-board propellant is necessary, but the acceleration is so low, that is takes a long time to get going. The momentum imparted from photons or solar particles is rather low. The pressure from the solar wind is on the order of 1 nPa.

Ref: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/sw_dials.html
http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ace_mission.html#summary
http://web.mit.edu/space/www/helio.review/axford.suess.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top