Can sodium's reactivity be controlled by isolating it in a vacuum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anachronistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sodium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between quarks, atomic structure, and chemical reactions, specifically regarding sodium. The original poster, a UC Berkeley graduate and engineering physics enthusiast, seeks clarification on whether quarks can rearrange to form protons and neutrons when isolating sodium in a vacuum. Key points include the assertion that chemical reactions do not affect the nucleus, meaning quarks remain unchanged regardless of electron behavior. The poster also highlights that sodium reacts by losing an electron to another atom, rather than directly with oxygen gas, and notes that sodium merely tarnishes in air but reacts vigorously with water. Responses emphasize that quarks are fundamental particles that do not rearrange in the context of chemical reactions, and that the original hypothesis lacks physical basis since chemical reactions do not influence nuclear processes like alpha and beta emissions. The conversation reflects a misunderstanding of the interactions at the atomic level and the stability of nuclear structures in relation to chemical behavior.
Anachronistic
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Hey guys, I am a graduate of UC Berkeley taking steps to relearn chemistry, physics, and mathematics. I can assist you guys tremendously about quarks if you guys can assist me also!

My high school chemistry teacher kept a piece of sodium metal in some oil to prevent the electrons from reacting with oxygen gas in an exothermic reaction. Now, I am an engineering physics enthusiast and a tutor trying to understand the concept of energy and quarks. I fear that I may confuse my students if I lead them into the wrong conclusion.


Here is my question.

Can quarks rearrange itself to form protons and neutrons if scientists can isolate one atom of sodium inside a vacuum? Afterall, energy release and absorption is a question of electron configuration stability. This stability is obtained by borrowing electrons from neighboring atoms.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Chemical reactions do not affect the nucleus. Isolating a sodium atom in a vacuum will not cause quarks in the nucleus to change. Quarks make up protons and nuetrons so "rearrange themsleves" statement makes no sense.

Also electrons do not react with the oxygen gas. A sodium reacts when one of its electrons are given away to another atom. Also sodium mearly tarnishes in air. It will react vigourouly with water.

This entire post does not make sense to me.
 
bm0p700f said:
Chemical reactions do not affect the nucleus. Isolating a sodium atom in a vacuum will not cause quarks in the nucleus to change. Quarks make up protons and nuetrons so "rearrange themsleves" statement makes no sense.

Also electrons do not react with the oxygen gas. A sodium reacts when one of its electrons are given away to another atom. Also sodium mearly tarnishes in air. It will react vigourouly with water.

This entire post does not make sense to me.

Firstly, if quarks are to be considered to be particles merely for our conceptualization, then we can study them using a statistical model. I haven't studied the statistical model. However, when a group of quarks happen to be arranged in a certain order, then it may turn into a proton or a neutron. I believe we all can agree that there is constant energy within the subatomic world. As a result, there has to be a balance that provides nuclear stability. When the balance is disrupted by an addition or a loss of an electron that disrupts the balance between the number of protons and electrons, I think the atom creates some potential energy threshold. If the electrons can reconfigure itself, then it goes through a chemical reaction. If the electrons find some energy obstacles, then perhaps the atom tends to go through a beta particle or an alpha particle nuclear reaction.
What do you think about my hypothesis?
 
  • Like
Likes Anwesh P
Chemical reaction do not trigger or hinder alpha and beta emmision. So your hypothesis does not have any physical basis.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top