Can Someone Explain The Theory Of Quantum Mechanics To Me?

AI Thread Summary
Quantum mechanics can be better understood through popular science books, with recommendations including "The Quantum World" by Kenneth William Ford and "Quantum Reality" by Nick Herbert. Paul Davies is highlighted as an excellent author for laypersons, with suggested titles like "The Mind of God" and "God and the New Physics." These books are available for purchase online. Engaging with these resources can provide a clearer understanding of complex quantum concepts. Exploring such literature is encouraged for those seeking to grasp the fundamentals of quantum mechanics.
shadowman
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
( I think the title of the thread was self-explanitory) :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not read one of the countless popular-science books about this subject? :smile: I suggest either The Quantum World by Kenneth William Ford or Quantum Reality by Nick Herbert.
 
Chen said:
I suggest either The Quantum World by Kenneth William Ford or Quantum Reality by Nick Herbert.

are these available online?
 
You can purchase them online. :wink:
 

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

On the non-applicability of Newtonian mechanics
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Don’t understand the general form of the Sinusoidal Wave Equation
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Does the classical theory of angular momentum explain this video of a unicycle robot?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Thoughts on neural networks "discovering" physical concepts
Replies
6
Views
1K
Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner?
Replies
4
Views
4K
A Is Quantum Mechanics Truly Underdetermined by Evidence?
Replies
22
Views
4K
B Parcel theory -- how can there be buoyancy with miscible gases?
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Lagrangian Mechanics, Continuous Particle Paths and QFT
Replies
6
Views
1K
I 1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate
Replies
20
Views
371
A Multiparticle Relativistic Quantum Mechanics in an external potential
Replies
22
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top