Can someone me? I have a pretty simple physics problem.

  • Thread starter Thread starter myelevatorbeat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
A user sought help with a physics problem involving a boat moving in a river with a current. The problem required calculating the time for a round trip of 175 meters downstream and upstream, considering the boat's speed relative to the water and the river's current. Initially, the user attempted to apply kinematic equations but realized that acceleration was not a factor in this scenario. The solution involved using the formula time = distance/velocity, adjusting for the current's effect on the boat's speed. Ultimately, the user calculated the total time for the trip as 44.4 seconds.
myelevatorbeat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I know this is probably going to seem like a fairly simply physics problem that I should be able to solve, however, I've been doing physics homework for the past 5 hours and my brain feels completely fried. If someone could help me get started on this, I would GREATLY appreciate it (it's my very last problem). So here it is:


A boat moves through the water of a river at 8 m/s relative to the water, regardless of the boat's direction. If the water in the river is flowing at 1.0 m/s, how long does it take the boat to make a round trip consisting of a 175 m displacement downstream followed by a 175 m displacement upstream?


At first I tried using the kinematic equation x-xo=vit+1/2at2 and solving for t. I assumed the acceleration was 1.0 one way and -1.0 the other way. However, the second equation (using -1.0 as the acceleration) doesn't give me a time I can use. I was planning on adding the two times together for the answer but now that isn't going to work. I'm pretty sure my brain is just fried and I should try to solve it another way, but at this moment I haven't a clue on how to get started.

THANK YOU!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind, i figured it out.

i must sound like I'm retarded lol.
 
There is no acceleration in the problem. So use time=distance/velocity. Which is the same thing as your kinematic equation with a=0. Simply add the velocity of the boat to the velocity of the river (+1 downstream and -1 upstream). It's simpler than you think.
 
Thanks for the help, Dick.

You're right. I was thinking it was just as complicated as the rest of the problems I've been doing all day.

I got 44.4 seconds.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top