Can someone tell me if this is right ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trae160
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation "2/5 = 5/8n - 4" and whether the answer "1 1/25" is correct. Participants clarify that the answer depends on the interpretation of the equation, with one suggesting the correct answer is "25/176" if interpreted as "2/5 = 5/(8n-4)." Another interpretation leads to "33/16" if the equation is viewed as "2/5 = 5/(8n) - 4." The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly clearing fractions to arrive at the right solution. Ultimately, the accuracy of the answer hinges on how the equation is set up.
trae160
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
can someone tell me if this is right please?

can someone tell me if this is right please?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

it says "solve the equation by first clearing the fractions." the equation is "2/5=5/8n-4" i got for my answer "1 1/25" is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cmon I am sure one of yall collage people can answer this is only a 7th grade problem.
 
The answer is 25/176, unless you mean 5/(8n-4), in which case it is 33/16
 
That depends what you mean, either:

\frac{2}{5}=\frac{5}{8n-4}

2(8n-4) = 25

Or:

\frac{2}{5}=\frac{5}{8n} - 4

2 = \frac{25}{8n} - 20

22 = \frac{25}{8n}

176n=25
 
ty everyone =)
 
I just thought you might also mean:

\frac{2}{5}=\frac{5}{8}n-4

\frac{16}{5}=5n-32

\frac{176}{5}=5n
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top