Can someone tell me if this makes sense? (Equalities question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnInsect
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the mathematical relationships between variables x and y, exploring the implications of inequalities and equalities. It suggests that if x is greater than y and vice versa, they must be equal, leading to the conclusion that both must differ by zero. The conversation highlights a logical contradiction in stating x > y and y > x simultaneously, emphasizing the need for clarity in definitions. The use of the symbol "≤" is proposed as a more accurate representation of the relationships, allowing for the conclusion that x equals y. Overall, the exchange seeks to clarify the proof while acknowledging the complexity of the concepts involved.
AnInsect
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
x>or=y
y>or=x
x=y+z
y=x+z

y=y+z+z
0=2z
0=z

x=y+z
x=y+0
x=y

I think what I just said is that if x is greater than y and y is greater than x, they must be greater than each other by zero, thus proving they are equal. It also works if x is greater than y by z and y is greater than x by say q (though in the end both q and z are zero).

Does this make any sense?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AnInsect said:
x>y
y>x
x=y+z
y=x+z

y=y+z+z
0=2z
0=z

x=y+z
x=y+0
x=y

I think what I just said is that if x is greater than y and y is greater than x, they must be greater than each other by zero, thus proving they are equal. It also works if x is greater than y by z and y is greater than x by say q (though in the end both q and z are zero).

Does this make any sense?

x > y precludes x = y by convention. So x > y and y > x is a logical contradiction, if by '<' you intend the usual meaning.

Your conclusion is valid if you use the symbol '\leq' which means "less than or equal to." In that case x \leq y and y \leq x do indeed imply that x = y. However I'm a little confused by your proof. What is z, is it supposed to be a constant? You essentially have the right idea but you need to make it a little more clear.
 
Last edited:
^Thank you for the clarification! I noticed that too, but then it sort of makes the entire thing redundant doesn't it? Ah well, journey's better than the destination I guess.

^z is any real number. You know, just a variable representing the difference between x and y.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top