Can Spherical Symmetry Techniques Extend Plane Symmetries?

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,

it is known that the symmetry groups on the 2d Euclidean plane are given by the point-groups (n-fold and dihedral symmetries) and the wallpaper groups.

However we can create more symmetries on the plane than just those.
For example we can stereographically project the 2d plane onto the unit sphere, and consider all the spherical symmetry groups (that are much more than those on the plane), and stereographically re-project the sphere onto the plane to obtain new symmetries.

Has this idea been explored already? I bet it was, but I can't find information on this.
And ultimately, why do people say that the symmetries of the plane are just the point-groups and the wallpaper groups?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok...so if I understand correctly, the idea is to use the Möbius transformations, which form the group of isometries of the Riemann sphere.

However I was thinking about the following alternative way of constructing new symmetries on the plane: that is, we express the surface of the Riemann sphere in spherical coordinate angles (\phi,\theta) and we apply the wallpaper group on the curvilinear coordinates (\phi,\theta) ?

Can this be expressed as Möbius transformation?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top