Can the 'Determinant' be Reversed for 2-by-2 Matrices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scikidus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between two 2-by-2 matrices A and B, where A*A = B. The elements of B can be expressed in terms of the elements of A through specific quadratic equations. The main inquiry is whether the elements of A can also be expressed solely in terms of the elements of B. It is noted that the equations derived from A*A = B are quadratic, indicating multiple potential solutions for A's elements. The connection to the "determinant" remains unclear, prompting further exploration of its relevance in this context.
scikidus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let there be a 2-by-2 matrix A with the elements:

[a b]
[c d]

Now, let there be a 2-by-2 matrix B with the elements:

[w x]
[y z]

Let A*A = B.

This means that w, x, y, and z can all be independantly represented solely in terms of a, b, c, and d.

My question: is there any way for a, b, c, and d to be represented solely in terms of w, x, y, and z?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, multiplying A*A out, you have a2+ bc= w, ab+ bd= x, ac+ cd= y, and bc+ d2= z. Now it is a matter of solving those 4 equations for a, b, c, and d.
Those are quadratic equations so there will be more than one solution - as you might expect from the fact that A*A= B is really "quadratic" itself.

Now, my question is, What does this have to do with the "determinant"?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top