Can the four potential be fixed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter USeptim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ability to determine the "fixed" four-potential of a point by integrating Lienard-Wiechert potentials from all charges in space-time, along with a term for radiated fields. It highlights that gauge conditions allow different potential fields to produce the same electromagnetic fields. The Lienard-Wiechert potential serves as the Green function for the Lorentz gauge, but other gauges yield different Green functions. The conversation also touches on the implications of gauge-fixing techniques in quantum field theory on system evolution. The topic raises questions about the uniqueness and determination of four-potentials in electromagnetic theory.
USeptim
Messages
98
Reaction score
5
Hello,

It’s well know that there are some gauge conditions that permit different potential fields to generate the same EM fields, this gauge conditions are:

A'=A+(e/c)∇χ
\phi'=\phi+(∂χ/∂t)

Where χ is any scalar field.

However, it’s also possible to get the potentials at some point integrating the four currents in the space through a Green function and adding a term due the fields in the boundary of the integration region (if this region is infinite, only radiated fields remain as long as charges are confined to some region).

This is well explained at this link:
http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Class/Electrodynamics/Electrodynamics/node148.html

Without discussing the ways to close the contour, in the next section (node149), the Lienard-Wiechert potentials are derived from the “upwards” contour Green function, and then it comes my qüestion:

Can the “fixed” four potential of a point be determined integrating the Lienard-Wiechert potentials caused by all the charges in the space-time plus a term due to the radiated field in the far past? Or there is some trick or caveat in this approach?

I wonder if it can be determined how can be used techniques as gauge-fixing in QFT which perhaps might affect the evolution of the system…



Sergio
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you Greg. In fact I rewrote the question in a new thread named "Can four-potential be uniquely defined?" that has been answered helpfully.

The Lienard-Wiechert potential is the green function for the Lorentz gauge election but others gauges would lead to another Green functions.Sergio
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top