Can the Fourier Transform Be Defined Without the Minus Sign?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the Fourier transform can be defined without the traditional minus sign, proposing an alternative definition as the forward transform. It is confirmed that such a definition is valid, and changing the sign does not affect the operation or physical interpretation of the transform. However, it is noted that this change will result in a different labeling of positive and negative frequencies. For real-valued functions, the negative-frequency spectrum is simply a mirror image of the positive-frequency spectrum. Ultimately, the choice of definition is a matter of convention among different groups.
jollage
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Usually the Fourier transform is defined as the one in the Wiki page here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform), see the definition.

My question is can I define Fourier transform as \intf(x)e^{2\pi ix \varsigma}dx instead, i.e., with the minus sign removed, as the forward Fourier transform? The backward one is the one with the minus sign. So the definition is the opposite to the definition on the wiki page.

Can I define this? Will the so-transformed frequency domain still bear the physical meanings as we usually talk about?

Thanks in advance. Any comment will help.

Jo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, jollage! :smile:

Yep. You can do that.
Fourier transforms are defined haphazardly as you may already have noticed.
Changing the sign or the constants does not change the way it operates, nor the physical meaning.
 
Just be aware that the result you get might differ from one found the other way.
 
OK, thank you for confirming this. This is great. I guess I could move on with this definition.
 
It just means that what you call a positive frequency, everyone else calls a negative frequency, and vice-versa. If you are dealing with real-valued functions only (i.e. not complex), it won't make much difference, because in that case the negative-frequency spectrum is just a mirror image of the positive-frequency spectrum.
 
Last edited:
jollage said:
Hi All,

Usually the Fourier transform is defined as the one in the Wiki page here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform), see the definition.

My question is can I define Fourier transform as \intf(x)e^{2\pi ix \varsigma}dx instead, i.e., with the minus sign removed, as the forward Fourier transform? The backward one is the one with the minus sign. So the definition is the opposite to the definition on the wiki page.
See equations 15 and 16 here:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransform.html

To get a "general" Fourier transform there are two free parameters that you can set. Different groups use different choices of those free parameters as their "standard", but it is all just a matter of convention.
 
Back
Top