Can the Hydrogen Wavefunction Be Normalized?

natugnaro
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


At time t=0 hydrogen atom is in state

\psi(r,0)=\frac{4}{(2a)^{3/2}}[e^{-r/a}+iA\frac{r}{a}e^{-r/2a}(-iY^{1}_{1}+Y^{-1}_{1}+\sqrt{7}Y^{0}_{1})]

a) Is it possible to normalize wave function ?
b) Find \psi(r,t) if at time t=0 measuring L_{z} we find \hbar

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



a)
Using eigenstates of hydrogen I can write\psi(r,0) as
\psi(r,0) = \frac{4\sqrt{\pi}}{2^{^3/2}}\varphi_{100} + 4\sqrt{3}A\varphi_{211}-4\sqrt{21}Ai\varphi_{210}-4\sqrt{3}Ai\varphi_{21-1}

Normalization condition \sum|c_{n}|=1 gives me A^{2}=\frac{1-2\pi}{432} or A=\sqrt{\frac{2\pi-1}{432}}i , but this does not satisfy normalization condition since I assumed that A is real.
I could assume that A is complex, but then I would get two unknowns (A=x+iy).
So I would say that it is not possible to normalize wave function.
If my answer is correct can someone explain this to me on practical example, do I need more information for normalizing ? where do I get it ? by measurment ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check your numbers, but you must have made a mistake somewhere.
Your coefficient for \phi_110 has to be less than 1.
 
The problem statement is an exact copy. Multiplying eigenstates by my coefficients I can get starting state.
But if the first term in parenthesis is \frac{e^{-r/a}}{\sqrt{4\pi}} instead of e^{-r/a} wave function can be normalized, A=\frac{1}{\sqrt{864}}
Maybe it is just a typo error.
 
Hi liorda , here is my solution:
Correcting some +/- signs and assuming that the first term in parenthesis is as I stated.
First multiply eigenstates of hydrogen by this constants:
\varphi_{100}*(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})
\varphi_{211}*(4\sqrt{3}A)
\varphi_{21-1}*(4\sqrt{3}Ai)
\varphi_{210}*(4\sqrt{21}Ai)

now we can write starting wave function as linear combination of hydrogen eigenstates:

\psi(r,0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\varphi_{100} + 4\sqrt{3}A\varphi_{211}+4\sqrt{21}Ai\varphi_{210}+4\sqrt{3}Ai\varphi_{21-1}

Normalization:
\left|\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\right|^{2}+\left|4\sqrt{3}A\right|^{2}+\left|4\sqrt{21}Ai\right|^{2}+\left|4\sqrt{3}Ai\right|^{2}=1
gives A=1/sqrt(864)

b)
You can write hydrogen eigenstates as radial part multiplied by spherical harmonics:
\varphi_{nlm}=R_{nl}(r)*Y^{m}_{l}(\theta,\phi)

so using this we can write Psi(r,0) as:

\psi(r,0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}R_{10}*Y^{0}_{0} + 4\sqrt{3}AR_{21}*Y^{1}_{1}+4\sqrt{21}AiR_{21}*Y^{0}_{1}+4\sqrt{3}AiR_{21}*Y^{-1}_{1}

In spherical harmonics Y^{m}_{l}(\theta,\phi) m is integer value of \hbar (m=-1*\hbar, 0*\hbar, 1*\hbar) you can obitain by measurment of Lz.
By measuring Lz system is left in eigenstate of operator Lz.
Since measurment gives L_{z}=\hbar , system is left in state:
\psi(r,0) = 4\sqrt{3}AR_{21}*Y^{1}_{1}
Now i'ts easy to find Psi(r,t) , just multiply Psi(r,0) by Exp(-i*E2*t/(hbar)).
E2 is because energy is determined by principal quantum number , which is 2 in this case.
(in Dirac notation state is written as |nlm> , so our state is |211>) .
Again this is my own solution, I don't have the "official" solution.
 
natugnaro said:
In spherical harmonics Y^{m}_{l}(\theta,\phi) m is integer value of \hbar (m=-1*\hbar, 0*\hbar, 1*\hbar) you can obitain by measurment of Lz.

correction:
In spherical harmonics Y^{m}_{l}(\theta,\phi) m=-l,...,0,...,+l.
Since l=1 => m=-1,0,1 , possible values for measurment of Lz are Lz=-hbar,0,+hbar
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top