Can the Lever Rule be Modified for a Three-Component Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lever
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the Lever Rule can be adapted for problems involving three components. A specific problem is presented where a quantity of 12,500 units is to be divided into three parts, with each part representing a percentage of the total. The equations derived from the problem indicate that there are two linear equations with three variables, leading to an infinite number of solutions. The calculations show that the values for each part can be expressed in terms of one variable, with constraints ensuring all parts remain positive. Ultimately, the conclusion is that such problems typically yield infinite results, which complicates finding a unique solution.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
Is it possible or not to solve the typical kind of problem given more than two components; take this self made problem: A quantity measuring 12500 units be divided into three parts such that 15% first, 20% second and 30% third amount to 25% original, that is 3125. What would be each divided value? I'm only looking for a solution as simple as two-component problem, nevertheless may try until some level of difficulty.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
vin300 said:
Is it possible or not to solve the typical kind of problem given more than two components; take this self made problem: A quantity measuring 12500 units be divided into three parts such that 15% first, 20% second and 30% third amount to 25% original, that is 3125. What would be each divided value? I'm only looking for a solution as simple as two-component problem, nevertheless may try until some level of difficulty.
If I understand this correctly, you will have two linear equations with three variables, and the condition that the three variables are positive. This kind of problems normally can have an infinite number of solutions.

In your example, you have
a+b+c=12500
15a+20b+30c=312500
a>0, b>0, c>0

You can solve the two equations for b and c in terms of a, and then get bounds for a by requiring that a>0, b>0, c>0.
The solutions are (if I didn't make a computation error):
b=6250-3a/2
c=6250+a/2
Requiring b>0 gives 0<a<4166.66
 
Yes I did reckon in a few hours time that this kind will produce infinite results, and also explains why it remained unseen. So sorry for the waste of time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top