B Can the moon orbit be used as perpetual motion?

AI Thread Summary
Creating a perpetual motion machine using the moon's orbit to generate energy is not feasible due to the laws of physics. While tidal power harnesses energy from the gravitational interaction between the Earth and the Moon, it is not truly perpetual as it has limits and will eventually cease when the Earth becomes tidally locked with the Moon. Any attempt to extract energy from an orbit would ultimately disrupt the orbit itself, leading to potential collisions. The concept misunderstands that orbits are a result of gravitational forces, not a source of propulsion. Therefore, the idea of using the moon's orbit for perpetual motion is fundamentally flawed.
Enniss
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'll attach a picture of what I mean but essentially I wanted to know if it was possible to (under circumstances where the Earth and moon do not change angle of rotation when orbiting the sun) create a perpetual motion machine using orbit as a means to turn a giant gear circling the Earth in order to create energy?
47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

If the answer is obvious I am sorry but I was just wondering about it and I don't follow physics very well

thanks

for some reason the IMG isn't posting so here's the link
https://gyazo.com/47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Enniss said:
I'll attach a picture of what I mean but essentially I wanted to know if it was possible to (under circumstances where the Earth and moon do not change angle of rotation when orbiting the sun) create a perpetual motion machine using orbit as a means to turn a giant gear circling the Earth in order to create energy?
47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2

If the answer is obvious I am sorry but I was just wondering about it and I don't follow physics very well

thanks

for some reason the IMG isn't posting so here's the link
https://gyazo.com/47bea0dd5f475e34e7aedb43b658eac2
That looks really expensive and impractical. Fear not, though, because we already have something that does the same thing: tidal power.

But please note that tidal power is considered "renewable" which is commonly presumed to mean "perpetual", but really isn't.
 
  • Like
Likes gneill and anorlunda
An orbit doesn't "propel" the orbiting object. The object is just continuously falling and missing the ground :wink:

Every orbit has a finite amount of mechanical energy associated with it. Steal the energy from an orbit and eventually you don't have an orbit anymore, you've got two colliding objects.

At least @russ_watters ' tidal power offering has limits on how much energy can be stolen (it's a very big amount, but still limited). Eventually the (Lunar) tides will cease when the Earth's rotation becomes tidally locked with the Moon's orbit. The Earth will then always present the same face to the Moon. I wonder which hemisphere will inherit the Moon? Don't bother placing bets, the outcome won't be known for some billions of years.
 
  • Like
Likes krater and davenn
Even if we could design and build such a device, it would slowly pull the Moon towards the Earth as it saps gravitational potential energy from the Moon. So no perpetual motion here.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Apart from all the other problems, may I just object to the statement that, "the orbit propels moon."
An orbit is simply a description of where something goes. What causes it to go there are things like the force of gravity from the earth.
If you add other forces, such as pulling on a wire, then you will change the orbit. The orbit is a result, not a cause.
 
  • Like
Likes krater, davenn and gneill
gneill said:
The Earth will then always present the same face to the Moon.

Only if the Earth-Moon system survives the death of the Sun.

BoB
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top