Can the Spherical Coordinate Integral be Simplified using a Substitution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying a double integral in spherical coordinates, specifically the integral of the reciprocal distance between points within two spheres. A key insight is that the inner integral depends only on the distance from the origin to r1, allowing for simplification by placing r1 along the θ=0 axis. Despite the complexity introduced by the angle between r1 and r2, it is suggested that the angle of r1 does not affect the inner integral due to the integration over all points in the sphere. A substitution involving the law of cosines is recommended to facilitate the integration process. The conversation concludes with a focus on ensuring correct setup and execution of the integral to achieve the desired result.
vincentchan
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
My professor said this problem is straightforward in spherical coordinates,

\int_{|\vec{r_1}|\leq a } \int_{|\vec{r_2}|\leq a } \frac{1}{|\vec{r_1}-\vec{r_2}|} d^3 r_2d^3r_1

i set up the integral in spherical coordinate and found it really ugly...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what this double integral means. The inner one is the integral over all points inside a sphere of the reciprocal of the distance between each point and a given point, r1. It's clear that this value will depend only on the distance from the origin of r1, so you might as well place it on the \theta=0 axis. Once you get the inner integral into the form of a function of r1 (which will have no \theta or \phi dependance), the outer integral should be pretty easy.
 
thank you for your quick reply, i don't think i can do this because the distance is depend on both r1 and r2 (not the origin to r1).

EDIT:
the angle between r1 and r2 will make the whole thing very messy
 
Yes, but I'm saying the angle of r1 won't matter in the inner integral because you're integrating over every point in the sphere. You'll get a value that only depends on the distance of r1 from the origin.

Also, you'll still have a rough integral to do over r2. A couple hints: Do the theta integral first, and when you get an expression that involves the square roots of perfect squares, make sure you take the positive root, which may mean you'll have to split up the integral into two ranges.

EDIT: The answer I get is: 32/15 pi^2 a^5
 
Last edited:
okay, I follow your way and find the first integral is 2 pi a^2, which is independent of r1... surely i did somthing wrong...

BTW, your answer is right
 
Well I can't help you if you don't show me some of your work. How did you set up the first integral? Use the law of cosinesfor the distance.
 
this is how my integral look like

\int \frac{ r_2^2sin \theta dr_2 d \theta d \phi }{\sqrt{r_1^2+r_2^2-2r_1r_2cos \theta }}
 
That looks right. Try using the substitution u=r_1^2+r_2^2-2r_1r_2 cos \theta to do the integral over theta first.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top