Can the Sum of Second Derivatives of Charges be Claimed in a CLC Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForumGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Resonance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's Loop Law in a circuit involving capacitors and inductors, specifically questioning whether the sum of the second derivatives of charges can be combined. The user is uncertain about adding the second derivatives and seeks clarification on whether the relationship q_1(t)/C_1 = q_2(t)/C_2 holds true. They draw parallels with the rules of derivatives, asking if the sum of derivatives can be treated similarly for second derivatives. Additionally, the user inquires about the voltage drop across an ideal wire connecting the inductor and capacitor. The conversation focuses on understanding the mathematical principles governing circuit analysis.
ForumGuy
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.21.07 PM.png

Homework Equations


Capacitor (C): v(t) = (1/c)*q(t)
Inductor (L): v(t) = L(d^2q(t)/dt^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Using Kirchoff's Loop law, the sum of voltages around each loop must be 0. I think I can thus claim the following:
Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.32.28 PM.png


But I'm not so sure I can add the two 2nd derivatives of the charges like that. IF, however, this is true, then can I also claim that q_1(t)/C_1 = q_2(t)/C_2, by subtracting the two equations (or just setting them equal to each other?).

I'm new to Physics Forums, though I've read a lot on here, so let me know if I'm violating any rules! Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.21.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.21.07 PM.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 1,299
  • Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.28.50 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.28.50 PM.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 555
  • Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.31.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.31.48 PM.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 547
  • Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.32.28 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 4.32.28 PM.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 762
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the rules of derivatives. Would you say that ##\frac {d} {dt} {(f(t) + g(t))}## the same as ##\frac {d} {dt} {f(t)} + \frac {d} {dt} {g(t)}## ?
If so then I think you have your answer. How would you apply this to 2nd derivatives?

Also look at the "wire" between the inductor and the capacitor. For an ideal wire, how much voltage drop is there across that?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top