Can the TE01 mode be used in an air-filled rectangular waveguide at 10 GHz?

  • Thread starter Thread starter faraaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waveguide Waves
faraaa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How to solve this problem?

An air-fi lled waveguide of rectangular cross-section (1 cm x 2 cm) is used to
carry EM waves at a frequency of 10 GHz.
Show that only the TE01 mode can be used?

I tried to find the cut-off frequency ( 7.5GHZ) and is that enough to prove that only TE01 can be used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
faraaa said:

Homework Statement



How to solve this problem?

An air-filled waveguide of rectangular cross-section (1 cm x 2 cm) is used to
carry EM waves at a frequency of 10 GHz.
Show that only the TE01 mode can be used?

I tried to find the cut-off frequency ( 7.5GHZ) and is that enough to prove that only TE01 can be used?

The answer to your question is no. You haven't justified your answer mathematically.

Use the formula for cutoff frequency fc(m,n,a,b) where m,n are the mode descriptors Tmn and a and b are the waveguide dimensions. Then show that the only possible mode is TE01. Remember to distinguish between a and b with respect to the cutoff formula.

PS the TM01 mode requires one extra step beyond just using the fc formula.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top