Can the Vector Sum OC Lie on, Inside, or Outside the Circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the vector sum OC formed by two vectors OA and OB originating from points on a circle. It explores whether OC can lie on the circle, inside it, or outside it. For OC to lie on the circle, it must equal the lengths of OA and OB, forming an equilateral triangle. If OC is inside the circle, it will be shorter than OA and OB, which is permissible in triangle formation. The positions of C depend on the angles between OA and OB, with extreme cases being when they are parallel or antiparallel, affecting the length of OC.
Karma
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Hard Vector Question Much Help Needed!

Points A and B are any two points on a cirlce with a center O. The heads of Vectors OA and OB lie on the circle. Vector OC is the sum of OA and OB . In the Diagram, the head of OC lies outside the circle. Explain your answer to each question.

a.)Is it Possible for the head of OC to lie on the Circle?

b.)Is it Possible for the head of OC to lie inside the circle?

c.)Where are all the possible positions for C?


Here is the Diagram! Thank you any help is appreciated. I tried doing some of the questions but All my answers were wrong, and i got confused, please help me! thank you very much
 

Attachments

  • Diagram.JPG
    Diagram.JPG
    6.3 KB · Views: 686
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't seen the diagram, but I think the notation makes it clear.

a) If the head of OC is on the circle, then it would be the same length as OA and OB. When you add OA and OB graphically, you'll be making a triangle with OC. Is there a triangle in which all three sides are the same length? If so, what can you say about that triangle?

b) If the head is inside the circle, then OC will be shorter than OA and OB (which, if you think about it, must be the same length). Is it possible to have a triangle with two sides the same length and the third side shorter?

c) Picture taking OA and OB and joining the head of OA to the tail of OB. OC will be the third side of the triangle formed. Let the angle between OA and OB vary - what are the possible lengths for the third side?

Note: If the notation isn't quite as clear as I thought it was, I may have to modify these answers when the diagram shows up.
 
Nicely answered!
 
a) If the head of OC is on the circle, then it would be the same length as OA and OB. When you add OA and OB graphically, you'll be making a triangle with OC. Is there a triangle in which all three sides are the same length? If so, what can you say about that triangle?

The triangle is an equilateral triangle in which all sides are the same or all angles are 60.. how does this help justify the answer though?


b) If the head is inside the circle, then OC will be shorter than OA and OB (which, if you think about it, must be the same length). Is it possible to have a triangle with two sides the same length and the third side shorter?

Yes it is Possible


c) Picture taking OA and OB and joining the head of OA to the tail of OB. OC will be the third side of the triangle formed. Let the angle between OA and OB vary - what are the possible lengths for the third side?

Sorry about that can you make this a little more clear

Im sorry if i sound stupid or anything, its just that I am taking this course one year up, and normally I am not supposed so I am not as qualified
 
You're not stupid, luv. You're just inexperienced in this stuff. That will change.

On the first one, asking about the triangle is just an outgrowth of the mathematician in my soul.

On the third one: Consider two extreme cases. Suppose OA and OB are antiparallel, so they lie along the same line. Next, suppose they're parallel, so again they lie along the same line. What would the difference between the first case and the second case be in terms of the length of the "third" side?

It may help to sketch these things out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top