Can the Work-Energy Theorem Determine Speed for Variable Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the applicability of the Work-Energy Theorem in scenarios involving variable acceleration. It is confirmed that while the net work may remain the same for different distances, the 50m scenario cannot be analyzed using constant acceleration equations due to the presence of variable force. Participants clarify that the situation can still be assessed analytically by expressing the variable force as a function of position and integrating. The distinction between constant and variable acceleration is emphasized, highlighting the need for appropriate kinematic equations. The conversation concludes with the assertion that variable acceleration can be handled analytically despite the limitations of traditional methods.
PAstudent
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
image.jpg
1. Homework Statement

The Attempt at a Solution



I was wondering if I did something wrong for the 50m. I did the same process of finding the area under the line. I'm assuming it's possible to get the same speed since the net work is the same.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it will be the same as for 20.
 
The 50m cannot be checked because it has a variable force from 20-50 and no longer a constant acceleration
 
PAstudent said:
The 50m cannot be checked because it has a variable force from 20-50 and no longer a constant acceleration
Not sure what you mean. Do you mean it cannot be checked analytically? It can. You would need to express the variable force as a function of x and integrate with respect to x to find the work done.
 
It says explain why Newton's second law and the constant acceleration kinematics equations cannot be used to check for the 50m
 
PAstudent said:
It says explain why Newton's second law and the constant acceleration kinematics equations cannot be used to check for the 50m
Yes, but that says using "constant acceleration" kinematics. As you say, it is not constant acceleration. But it can be checked analytically by using kinematics that cope with variable acceleration because the nature of that variation is known exactly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top